RB is never a gaping need. And certainly less so for a team with our line. We turned McFadden an old bad scheme fit into a pro bowler. By all means draft a RB. Just not at 4. And again I'll point to Sproles who last night was every bit the weapon Zeke was. With less help around him.
And we'll have to agree to disagree that Ramsey as a prospect was a "huge step down" from Zeke as a prospect. I'm happy to side with every NFL GM and scout.
And we'll have to agree to disagree that Ramsey as a prospect was a "huge step down" from Zeke as a prospect. I'm happy to side with every NFL GM and scout.
Not drafting RBs high is the right rule, but the rules are made for the many and not the few. Zeke is the few - he was BPA and filled a gaping need and plays a skill position.
The other part of that argument is that taking a defensive player at 4 was likely a huge step down in quality.
You can get by with journeymen RBs but you aren't going to be a dominant team. You will with Zeke. And Sproles had a better YPC last night but he only has two games this season with more than 10 carries and this was his season high with 15 carries. If you tried to make him your full time RB over a full season he would last four games before he landed on the IR with an injury.
Positional value does not matter when drafting elite talent, Zeke is indeed elite.
Looking at a 1 year cap hit is remedial salary cap analysis. Let's look at Guaranteed money. Zeke has 5x that on Sproles. Lets look at cost. Zeke cost us a 4. Sproles was free for the taking.Sproles has the same cap hit as Zeke and he would never hold up as a full time RB. He would also get our QB killed in pass protection, so you would have two starters on IR at midseason.
I can point to one game where Dunbar was a better weapon than Sproles, but that doesn't mean it applies over the course of a season or several seasons. Zeke is going to be dominant for five years or more.
I never saw anyone say that Ramsey was a huge drop off from Zeke. The Cowboys didn't even think that as the decision came down to the wire."Every NFL GM and Scout" don't agree on any player, much less on Ramsey.
So what Murray did as a 3rd rounder in this offense?I said he'd need 1800 yards and 10tds to justify the pick. He's on his way to doing that.
"Every NFL GM and Scout" don't agree on any player, much less on Ramsey.
What I wouldn't have is a RB in the top 4 of the draft having a great season....the same type of great season we got 2 years ago from a 3rd round running back.
So what Murray did as a 3rd rounder in this offense?
DeMarco has played 6 seasons in the NFL and averaged 997 yards per season, even including that one glory year.
So what Murray did as a 3rd rounder in this offense?
I said he'd need 1800 yards and 10tds to justify the pick. He's on his way to doing that.
It's not worth it arguing with TM. He repeats the same recycled lines over and over, offering ridiculous one-off examples like Booker. No, it's not hard to find a guy who can get you yards; it is, however, crazy hard to find a RB who can week in and out catch the ball well, block well, AND lead the NFL in rushing over two guys who have played an additional game. The Rasmey supporters' hubris is larger than their logic.
How about a Superbowl? Would that be ok too?Nobody said Zeke wasn't going to be a beast. We said RBs don't last as long and are easier to replace than other positions. Zeke has been a stud and has helped us more than Ramsey (or whomever) would have so far this season. But it's only been 7 games into year 1. We need to see Zeke stay healthy for 5 years and justify a 2nd contract before we say he was the right pick. It's just too early.
I like TM and I thought Ramsey would be the pick, but I can also say that I was wrong and am happy that I was.