SteveTheCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,133
- Reaction score
- 16,175
Post 9 says ryan leaf.Look at post 9
Post 9 says ryan leaf.Look at post 9
Honestly I see many post or words being misread or misinterpreted . Sometimes people see what they want to see.If most people saw it my way, that should tell you something.
The masses know how to read.Honestly I see many post or words being misread or misinterpreted . Sometimes people see what they want to see.
I’m not sure if the masses all reading into it wrong is worthy of notation other than poor reading comprehension which is unfortunately far too common on the internet.
If you want to interpret that every backup QB who started a game for us was a NFL starting QB that’s on you and others .The masses know how to read.
If we "interpreted it incorrectly" it's because the OP wasn't clear.
A backup QB who STARTS a game is quite literally the STARTING QB for that game. That isn't at all debatable.
Gypsies, tramps and thieves ,,,Yes! An endless stretch of draft busts and retreads.
Never happened.Figure it out.
Exactly, he was a much better QB than fans wanna admit.Before anyone says Quincy Carter, he had a QB record of 18-16 and led the Cowboys to the playoffs once.
LOL we've already established that the OP wasn't clear if most people in this thread misunderstood what he meant.If you want to interpret that every backup QB who started a game for us was a NFL starting QB that’s on you and others .
Then let’s ask the OP for clarification .
Maybe it was intention to include every QB who ever started a game for the Cowboys.
@diamonddelts
And I am old.It was Steve Pelluer. And he was arguably our worst starting QB in Cowboys history.
He was better than Chad HuchinsonExactly, he was a much better QB than fans wanna admit.
Because I don’t believe most NFL fans believe if you start one game in your career are considered a starting QB. Instead I believe some fans misread or mistook OP meaning.LOL we've already established that the OP wasn't clear if most people in this thread misunderstood what he meant.
Your statement is literally correct: every QB who has started an NFL game was literally an NFL starting QB, even if it was just for 1 game.
The OP never clarified "FULL-TIME STARTER" or "NUMBER 1 ON THE DEPTH CHART ENTERING THE SEASON."
How are you even arguing this?
Sweeney won his two starts as a scab and looked good. He just wasn't real NFL starter material at all.Scab: Kevin Sweeney
Non scab: Steve Pelluer tied with Clint Stoerner
Words have meanings or we can't communicate effectively.Because I don’t believe most NFL fans believe if you start one game in your career are considered a starting QB. Instead I believe some fans misread or mistook OP meaning.
"No true Scotsman" fallacy.No analyst would say every QB off the bench in a back up role who started a game due to injuries would be defined as a NFL starting QB.
Now Dak is an exception because he eventually became our starting QB.
Yep and too often communication on the internet is a challenge. Not everyone reads it the same and take meanings of words differently.Words have meanings or we can't communicate effectively.
Fans make him out to be a lot worse than he was because of the bad teams we had when he got here under Campo and the way it ended for him because of his drug issues. He did have some good games and led the Cowboys to a 10-6 season and the playoffs. He had a winning QB record, Neither Steve Pelluer or Gary Hogeboom ever led the Cowboys to the playoffs and both had losing QB records.Exactly, he was a much better QB than fans wanna admit.