Hahahaha... "proven loser".
There were threads on this board and at The Ranch before the season started speculating that he could be a Hall Of Fame inductee if he were to win the Super Bowl with the 'Boys.
But after a 2-2 start in which he's had a few bad road games against quality defensive teams... he's a "proven loser." Hilarious.
People all over the place were saying that the biggest liability for this team was Drew Bledsoe.
Didn't Peter King pick us to win the Super Bowl? Didn't many other publications pick us to go deep into the playoffs?
How can anyone possibly use the "it was only one bad game" line?
How? Here's how...
Be honest. Before the Eagles game, what was your take on the Cowboys Super Bowl chances THIS year? Were they nonexistent?
BE HONEST.
Because if the answer is "no", then it
WAS this game that is making you face-plant off the cliff.
He doesnt have a proven track record of horrid decisions and choking when the games get important.
BAHAHAHA! So now Bledsoe has a track record of being a "choker"? I guess you missed the Chargers, 49ers, Panthers, Eagles, and Chiefs games last year.
Super Bowl? We have to make the playoffs first, and with deadslow at the helm, Im not liking the chances.
Didn't we finish 9-7 last year and barely miss the playoffs? And isn't our team much stronger on paper this year than it was last year?
How do you know what happens if Romo sees the field?
Chances are he won't be the next Tom Brady. That's pure logic. He might be, but he LIKELY won't be.
The point is, it would be idiotic to gamble the season on a kid who's never thrown an NFL pass when we
STILL HAVE THE SAME SUPER BOWL HOPES WE HAD DURING THE PRESEASON.
I'm still just absolutely astonished that a bad game in
EARLY OCTOBER is enough for you clowns to jump off the deep end and give up on the season, when we're still 2-2 and right in the mix.
Good thing Parcells (ya know, that guy who knows
INFINITELY more about football and his team than any of us) sees things my way and not yours.