Goldenrichards83;2094831 said:
I thought we were friends, we just don't see the same side of this issue. Look in some ways I am dissapointed in Roy but I defend him because most make him out to be this has been and its not the case. I played the game of football all 4 years in highschool and 2 years in college and what we always said is if you are struggleing in some aspect of the game you need to make it up in other ways. Yes Roy struggled in coverage but he made up for that by leading the team in solo tackles and 2nd in total tackles. but you guys act as if he is a total waste.
I agree with you on many principles there but making up for a lack of coverage doesn't make it ok to allow passes willy-nilly.
Roy could blast ballcarriers on every run and knock a couple of guys out cold per game... but if other teams can drop back when they badly need a first down, find where Roy is, target him, lock on to that receiver, throw the ball there and move the chains, then Roy becomes almost too big of a liability to overcome.
Williams' big plays in the run game doesn't stop critical third downs from being converted.
All it takes is one weak link in the secondary and a few things happen:
1. Teams target that weak spot and don't have to read the defense nearly as efficiently... the QB can pretty much just lock on and throw to Roy's guy because he knows that his guy will probably be open.
2. The pass rush becomes much less effective. When a QB knows where he's going, drops back and releases the ball in rhythm, the pass rush has a whole lot less time to get there. If you don't have a weakness in the secondary, the QB has to search more for open receivers and that extra tick of time gives the OLB's and DL enough time to get there. In other words, if we didn't have a coverage liability in on that down, the QB wouldn't simply throw towards him, but would instead have to search for an open receiver. That extra time would translate into sacks.
3. In any critical situation the offense can target the weakness in coverage and win in a good portion of the time. Third and long? No problem, just send the TE down the middle and float it over the coverage. First and goal? Just find Roy.
One known weak spot in coverage and the offensive coordinator will eat that up. We don't need a player back there that teams can gameplan towards. We need them guessing on coverages and who will be where. Mostly, we need only guys who can cover well in the secondary, and I think this year we have a group that will play so well, teams won't have a clue where to throw the ball.
All else being equal, I agree with you that I'd like to see Roy making some bonecrushing hits and forcing some fumbles... but we just can't afford for him to be out there in coverage on any type of consistant basis. Teams will simply target him (and be successful) far too often.