Sydla
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 61,726
- Reaction score
- 95,236
See the problem is we need to forget about this 2-3 year window. Tony Romo has already been a starter for 8 years and this team has one playoff win to show for it. That is in no way to say that Romo is to blame for all of the short comings of this team. But you cant tell me any other team in the league who would sit on this plateau for 8 going on 9 years and not even TRY to make a change at QB. Logic says its moronic to try to do the same thing with the same guy for 10-11 years who couldnt do it the first 8.
The problem with your logic is this team has made the decision financially to continue on the Romo ride. You can sit there as a fan and say you'd make the change but unfortunately, it's clear the organization doesn't think like that. If Romo was nearing the end of his contract, your argument would have more merit but the fact is this team invested a ton of money into Romo, they still owe him a lot of money, he has a big cap hit the next couple of years.................. all that adds up to the realization that this organization is banking on Romo being the QB of this team the next 2-3 years.
So drafting Manziel would be idiotic IMO because you are wasting a prime draft pick on a guy who will sit on the bench for 2-3 years when you could have drafted a guy who might make an immediate impact now and get this team back into the playoffs.