- Messages
- 78,654
- Reaction score
- 42,998
I think the "we should have kept Carr" faction is largely saying that because he's better than Carroll. I don't think anyone would be saying we need Carr back if the Cowboys had brought in a better veteran CB. But they didn't.
I had no issue with Carr being let go if they had drafted some quality CBs in the draft (they did) and brought in a real solid vet or two at CB to help bring along the young guys (we didn't).
Same logic with Wilcox. I had no issue with him walking............. but they just let him walk and handed the job to Heath. Again, it's questionable that we really upgraded there at all.
Keeping Carr would be counter productive.
They wanted to switch to a Zone secondary and finally did. They will live and die with the decisions they made on that area...but keeping Carr was just not going to happen.
However we both agree that if they had brought someone in better suited to it than Carroll...we would be better off.
However keep in mind as well that injuries are hurting us and hurt us last night as well.
Many of the young rookie DBs did not get a full or even half amount of training camp to learn the system.
On top of that OScan did not play due to injury and at one point we had two healthy CBs on the roster last night in Brown and Lewis and lewis did make mistakes but he also showed that he could actually catch an INT.
They will be thrown to the fire and hopefully they come out stronger for it.