texbumthelife
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,738
- Reaction score
- 23,273
A good owner would not let a bad GM run his franchise into the ground for almost 25 years
I selected Good owner/Bad GM, but that's a damn good point.
A good owner would not let a bad GM run his franchise into the ground for almost 25 years
I would say he's been a good owner for the overall NFL landscape. Revenue generation. Expanding the leagues brand, etc.How can you be a good owner and hire Jerry as GM, then hire Jason Garrett as HC? How does that make Jerry a good owner?
It is a more a critical thinking exercise and less an IQ test.
Color me shocked you disagree, Risen. Color me shocked.I couldn't disagree more. There is only one answer. Everything else is laughable.
WordI couldn't disagree more. There is only one answer. Everything else is laughable.
No, he's not a great owner. He's said he'd fire a GM with the record he has, but since he's the owner he gets to keep playing at it. That makes him a terrible owner. He knows a way to improve the team but won't.[/QU.
Would you fire yourself? didn't think so
I out Good owner bad GM to piss everybody off. Besides that I was told we were getting a Garrett replacement pollAnyone choosing/saying anything other than bad owner/bad gm is exposing themselves
You cant be a good owner and continue employ one of the worst GM in sports
How can you be a good owner and hire Jerry as GM, then hire Jason Garrett as HC? How does that make Jerry a good owner?
I'd rather be adding money to the bottom line by Lombardi's to the trophy case.You can't say he is a bad owner when the Cowboys are the most valuable sports franchise in the world.