I think you make some interesting points, but you are playing fast and loose with the relationship between accountability and revenge. I like the concepts of forgiveness, mercy, grace and rehabilitation—-but those are applied at the discretion of judges/victims....not a violator who just shrugs and says, “I’m sorry.”
The core issue at hand is the life balance of predictability. -
- If I work hard, I should have enough to get by.
- If I’m a just / law abiding person, I should have protection under the law.
- if I am reckless and dangerous and imperil others’ safety......there should be a price that serves two purposes.
1- separation from the people I’ve hurt
2- some measure of balance (punishments/ vengeance ) that shows the victims and society at large that the balance above is respected.
Otherwise- why ever follow rules of society or participate in modern society if there are no protections?
I’m not saying one strike and you’re out (depending on your crime of course) but in this case, he made decisions over time that disrespected the balance that society provides and people in his life.