It's funny that you're not smart enough - or simply lack the self-awareness - to realize that what I've said is exactly true.
You post articles (thanks for that by the way), and then get pissy because people disagree with them. As I found you're the guy who wrote it. Clearly you're not. I've seen what you type, It's barely English. 'Burn barrel?' Nobody knows nor cares what that means.
And don't ever talk about anyone else making a 'valid comment' when you're incapable yourself and instead get told 'what to think' and jump in lockstep. That's your problem, not anyone else's.
Grow up and accept the fact that not everyone agrees with every part of the articles you post. You'd save yourself a lot of unnecessary timeouts.
No one asked you to...but you always assume a negative slant. I don't have the either or agenda that you start to insult from.
Up front, the COWBOYS don't agree with you at all...so would I then trust? Not you stud.
Too much of a coward to take the signature bet, huh? Good night Pinocchio....I like what has been assembled in the defensive line. Want to put together a signature bet on production from that group specificly?
As to imput from scouts, they certainly don't agree with what you presented. Ever listen to Sirius...try channel 88.
As to the Landry Hat, you are such a cutie to always insult an article presented from them. I don't agree with all they say, but there are quite a few observations that they work up, that simply are enlightening and not a pompous stance.
I'll gladly listen to them, even going to Sirius, before taking a pessimistic flame flower's tossing of crap.
But get real and discuss...what exactly is the limiting aspect that without debate, dooms this defensive line. The guys, and the OP, was target on...the big ugglies are definitely getting stronger and with more workable depth. You can't disagree there. You'll be in a minority in all sites or media sources, for the record. Prove other wise, and quit just tossing crap back...I am disagreeing with YOU.