Has Dak been hiding how bad our offensive is?

BobbyFlame469

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,468
Reaction score
1,903
I'd take Romo over Dak any day of the week. Romo was an electric player, Dak is a bus driver. However, both have the same thing in common - their careers are and were wasted in Dallas.
You would but no nfl player on the cowboys team would or did. Also, the coach and the owner.

And they know much more about football than you.


Dak is already quite a bit better than romo but that isn’t saying much nor is the discussion about that
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,056
Reaction score
25,880
Men lie. Women lie. Numbers don’t though.

Dak is better at every single quarterback metric than Tony Romo ever was even with a declining o-line, no all pro receivers, and a declining Zeke.


Well not exactly every metric. He has less interceptions :lmao2:
Missed the point.

Its not a Romo is better than Dak thing....I would rate them as extremely similar.

I think Romo covered Garrett early on. That staff wasn't even as good as it looked.
 

BobbyFlame469

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,468
Reaction score
1,903
Tony Romo never had a Zeke or the OL that Dak does. Apparently the list should be amended to read, "Men lie, Women lie and so does Bobby Flame".
Tony Romo had more interceptions than touchdowns in 2015.

he was on pace for 20 touchdowns and 28 interceptions after 4 HORRIBLE games.

That 2014 season he was carried heavily by our amazing team. There is a reason he threw the least amount of passes of his career and we had the MOST amount of success. Our running game carried us like the Titans.

Tony was never able to have us compete in games like Dak with his arm. He has less 400 yard games and 3 touchdown games in his entire career than Dak does in his last 16 starts.
 

BobbyFlame469

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,468
Reaction score
1,903
Missed the point.

Its not a Romo is better than Dak thing....I would rate them as extremely similar.

I think Romo covered Garrett early on. That staff wasn't even as good as it looked.
Quincy Carter made the playoffs and achieved as much as Tony did. I don’t know...
 

Vandyr

Well-Known Member
Messages
808
Reaction score
1,060
You would but no nfl player on the cowboys team would or did. Also, the coach and the owner.

And they know much more about football than you.


Dak is already quite a bit better than romo but that isn’t saying much nor is the discussion about that

And the argument could be made that sitting Romo in favor of Dak cost us the Superbowl that year. Dak is not better than Romo, no honest person that's seen them both play would come to that conclusion. Dak is a bus driver dude, plain and simple. Romo was a gunslinger. They had completely different playstyles that aren't really comparable. In some some situations and team builds, one will be a better fit than the other.
 

BobbyFlame469

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,468
Reaction score
1,903
And the argument could be made that sitting Romo in favor of Dak cost us the Superbowl that year. Dak is not better than Romo, no honest person that's seen them both play would come to that conclusion. Dak is a bus driver dude, plain and simple. Romo was a gunslinger. They had completely different playstyles that aren't really comparable. In some some situations and team builds, one will be a better fit than the other.
Romo would not have even made the NFC championship game.

And if you think he could’ve won a shoot out with the Falcons in the playoffs with Tony who historically is a turnover machine compared to the median quarterback you’re kidding.

Dak gave us the best chance against winning. Tony couldn’t get past Aaron Rodgers in 2014 that only had 1 leg.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
Tony Romo had more interceptions than touchdowns in 2015.

he was on pace for 20 touchdowns and 28 interceptions after 4 HORRIBLE games.

That 2014 season he was carried heavily by our amazing team. There is a reason he threw the least amount of passes of his career and we had the MOST amount of success. Our running game carried us like the Titans.

Tony was never able to have us compete in games like Dak with his arm. He has less 400 yard games and 3 touchdown games in his entire career than Dak does in his last 16 starts.

Who cares? This thread, it's not about Romo. I mean, if you want to talk about Tony Romo, go start a new thread.

You tell yourself whatever you want but don't try to tell me about it because I already know you are wrong. I know you are a Dak fanboy. See, I was never a fan who thought Tony was the be all, end all. I never wanted to pay Tony and I thought it was a mistake to ever do it. Guess what, I was right. I don't think Dak is the end all, be all and it would be a mistake for us to Pay him. So all of this BS is of no consequence to me. The 2014 OL is not the best one we've ever had, period, end of subject. If you want to believe that, no skin of my backside but it's not true IMO.

Lastly, Dak hasn't yet shown that we "compete" in games. We get down early, we stay down and we don't win against tough teams. That's it, that's what he's shown thus far. You can like or don't, I don't care but that's what the record shows.

Sorry for your luck.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
Romo would not have even made the NFC championship game.

And if you think he could’ve won a shoot out with the Falcons in the playoffs with Tony who historically is a turnover machine compared to the median quarterback you’re kidding.

Dak gave us the best chance against winning. Tony couldn’t get past Aaron Rodgers in 2014 that only had 1 leg.

Apparently, neither could you favorite RB, Murray. He fumbled in that game in an open field if I'm not mistaken.
 

BobbyFlame469

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,468
Reaction score
1,903
Who cares? This thread, it's not about Romo. I mean, if you want to talk about Tony Romo, go start a new thread.

You tell yourself whatever you want but don't try to tell me about it because I already know you are wrong. I know you are a Dak fanboy. See, I was never a fan who thought Tony was the be all, end all. I never wanted to pay Tony and I thought it was a mistake to ever do it. Guess what, I was right. I don't think Dak is the end all, be all and it would be a mistake for us to Pay him. So all of this BS is of no consequence to me. The 2014 OL is not the best one we've ever had, period, end of subject. If you want to believe that, no skin of my backside but it's not true IMO.

Lastly, Dak hasn't yet shown that we "compete" in games. We get down early, we stay down and we don't win against tough teams. That's it, that's what he's shown thus far. You can like or don't, I don't care but that's what the record shows.

Sorry for your luck.
We shall see...

the only quarterbacks that could do better than Dak in Dallas are Mahomes, Wilson, Rodgers, and Deshaun.
 

JJHLH1

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,312
Reaction score
14,627
Dak is a bus driver dude, plain and simple.

Nah.

Dak is the only player in NFL history to throw for at least 450 yards in 3 consecutive games, and to pass for at least 400 yards while rushing for 3 TDs in a game.

Dak shattered the all-time passing record through the first 5 games of a season last year, despite not finishing the fifth game.

Dak led the offense to #1 ranking in 2019.

Not saying he’s Tom Brady, but he’s definitely no bus driver.
 

ondaedg

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,891
Reaction score
3,034
No. He's actually displayed exactly how good or bad or Offense is. People, you need to stop acting like Dak is the difference maker in our Offense. It's just not true. The strength of our team is the OL. It has been for years. When the OL is strong, the Offense is good. When it's not, the Offense is bad. It's as straight forward as that.

I've seen Dak make some ridiculously good throws running for his life...

The oline can only have so much of an impact which is why teams like the Chiefs don't have nearly as much draft resources tied up in that one position group like we do.
 

Qcard

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,650
Reaction score
7,394
Yes, Dak is boosting the offense but when you boost it to top 5 as he has the last 2 seasons he'd played then you likely have a lot of talent around you. The OL has fallen off the roof with injuries galore but the weapons right now are elite.

Dallas isn't the Chiefs but they are right up there with all mortal offenses in the NFL.

I'd argue the play-calling was fine to better than fine and all the interest in Kellen wasn't just home cooking in Boise.
But the drop off from top 5 offense to 16th best offense was directly related to the loss of 1 guy, Dak.
That's why you pay the QB. ALWAYS.
:hammer:
 

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
41,077
Reaction score
41,060
Who cares? This thread, it's not about Romo. I mean, if you want to talk about Tony Romo, go start a new thread.

You tell yourself whatever you want but don't try to tell me about it because I already know you are wrong. I know you are a Dak fanboy. See, I was never a fan who thought Tony was the be all, end all. I never wanted to pay Tony and I thought it was a mistake to ever do it. Guess what, I was right. I don't think Dak is the end all, be all and it would be a mistake for us to Pay him. So all of this BS is of no consequence to me. The 2014 OL is not the best one we've ever had, period, end of subject. If you want to believe that, no skin of my backside but it's not true IMO.

Lastly, Dak hasn't yet shown that we "compete" in games. We get down early, we stay down and we don't win against tough teams. That's it, that's what he's shown thus far. You can like or don't, I don't care but that's what the record shows.

Sorry for your luck.
Yes you crapped on Romo, you’re crapping on Dak and if you’re old enough you crapped on Troy. Because that’s who you are.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
35,538
Reaction score
12,821
Yes you crapped on Romo, you’re crapping on Dak and if you’re old enough you crapped on Troy. Because that’s who you are.

lmao! What? You are funny...when the last time you went to the potty?
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,218
Reaction score
26,816
In 2019 we ranked #1 in yards per game and #4 in points per game with a bruised Amari Cooper, still raw Micheal Gallup, and Randall Cobb who only started 6 games.

and before anyone says it was because we were down all the time we ranked #3 in points scored in the 1st quarter and #4 in points scored in the 2nd quarter.


Come 2020 for the first 4 games Dak started we ranked #2 in points per game and again #1 in yards per game.

Unfortunately, He gets hurt and we see Kellen Moore coach us to a slightly below average ranking of #16 in both points and yards.


Are we wasting our franchise quarterback’s prime and top 10 wideout with doo doo play callers?
really that al you saw how about third string OL and zeke coming of covid then had two leg injuries' and playing from 3 scored down a lot so being forced into obvious passing situations..no way it was oh we missed dak..dak would not have faired much better this season as you think because while we scored a lot the first 4 games we lost about 14 more starters once he went down..seriously,

exaggerate much?

maybe we get 2-3 more wins with him MAYBE , BIG IF..

16th ranking with our 3rd string team is pretty darn good if you ask me..
 

cern

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,900
Reaction score
21,050
Not really. The Chiefs, Bills and Bucs don't even try to run.
Bucs ran 369 times, passed 410 times. That's fairly balanced. Chiefs and bills were both heavily in favor of pass. 2/3 pass to 1/3 run. But bills were bounced.
 

cern

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,900
Reaction score
21,050
Top