News: PFT: Cowboys should lift NDAs, allowing cheerleaders to tell their stories regarding voyeurism

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
55,549
Reaction score
36,700
So you simply believe the allegations are true even though you have no evidence proving it true. I could assume it's because you want something else to feed your Jerry hate.
I believe there could have been a cover up. Which could be a greater indictment than whatever perverted voyeurism is accused .

Of course , you don’t like the message so now you’re going to attack the messenger. How original.

And why would anyone defend the Cowboys position on this matter?
 

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
I believe there could have been a cover up. Which could be a greater indictment than whatever perverted voyeurism is accused .

Of course , you don’t like the message so now you’re going to attack the messenger. How original.

And why would anyone defend the Cowboys position on this matter?

Attack? Are we this soft that we call it attack...lol

You just used the word "could" so why would you chastise/condemn the team with no proof...lol

There's a lot of could in there it's all speculating and assuming
 

RonnieT24

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,598
Reaction score
21,688
Right. You’ve never passed judgment on anyone in your life . Lol
I'm not saying I haven't.. but I try to stay away from it if I can. Like every other person on the planet I am imperfect... but I at least TRY to be a better person. Don't always succeed but if I see the masses doing something that I believe is wrong I am willing to depart from the herd. Take the Zeke suspension .. I was fine with Zeke being suspended a game or two for pulling up that girl's top or bumping that security guard (who totally flopped) in Vegas.. But I was not in favor of his being sacked for 6 games on the word of a chick who had already been shown to be willing to lie to the cops to try and keep claws in her meal ticket. (him.) Especially after the investigator employed by the very entity seeking to suspend him, the NFL, basically concluded the chick was lying about he crap that went on between her and Zeke. Not saying he was innocent or that something didn't happen.. just that the chief witness (her) was deemed to be a lying sack o excrement. It was not difficult for me to say Zeke did some stupid things, of which there was proof, and punishment was warranted. And then say that the other crap he was being accused of was not plausible and unsubstantiated by any credible proof.. so no punishment was justified. Not that Goodell cared what I thought.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
55,549
Reaction score
36,700
Attack? Are we this soft that we call it attack...lol

You just used the word "could" so why would you chastise/condemn the team with no proof...lol

There's a lot of could in there it's all speculating and assuming
Speculation is exactly what we do on this forum. Do you have an opinion on the situation or are you just here in an attempt to thwart any negative conjecture?

If you don’t believe 2.4 million settlement is an admission of some due responsibility then I’m not sure what would . The settlement implies more of a negative vibe than I could have . Lol
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
55,549
Reaction score
36,700
I'm not saying I haven't.. but I try to stay away from it if I can. Like every other person on the planet I am imperfect... but I at least TRY to be a better person. Don't always succeed but if I see the masses doing something that I believe is wrong I am willing to depart from the herd. Take the Zeke suspension .. I was fine with Zeke being suspended a game or two for pulling up that girl's top or bumping that security guard (who totally flopped) in Vegas.. But I was not in favor of his being sacked for 6 games on the word of a chick who had already been shown to be willing to lie to the cops to try and keep claws in her meal ticket. (him.) Especially after the investigator employed by the very entity seeking to suspend him, the NFL, basically concluded the chick was lying about he crap that went on between her and Zeke. Not saying he was innocent or that something didn't happen.. just that the chief witness (her) was deemed to be a lying sack o excrement. It was not difficult for me to say Zeke did some stupid things, of which there was proof, and punishment was warranted. And then say that the other crap he was being accused of was not plausible and unsubstantiated by any credible proof.. so no punishment was justified. Not that Goodell cared what I thought.
I’m sure if this was on another team you’d be more suspect but because of the incredible track record and integrity of our owner you find this all difficult to believe I suppose. Just our own cheerleaders looking for a payday:)
 
Last edited:

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
Speculation is exactly what we do on this forum. Do you have an opinion on the situation or are you just here in an attempt to thwart any negative conjecture?

If you don’t believe 2.4 million settlement is an admission of some due responsibility then I’m not sure what would . The settlement implies more of a negative vibe than I could have . Lol

Just because you speculate on this forum, doesn't make you or me right. Right? I'd you've been paying attention you can go back and read my opinion,

Lol you obviously not privy to the many reasons settlements are given and taken, because incould turn around and say accepting a settlement is a money grab. It goes both ways.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
55,549
Reaction score
36,700
Just because you speculate on this forum, doesn't make you or me right. Right? I'd you've been paying attention you can go back and read my opinion,

Lol you obviously not privy to the many reasons settlements are given and taken, because incould turn around and say accepting a settlement is a money grab. It goes both ways.
Awesome. I was waiting on you to go after the cheerleaders. I’m sure it’s all been fabricated and just a money grab. Lol
 

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
Awesome. I was waiting on you to go after the cheerleaders. I’m sure it’s all been fabricated and just a money grab. Lol

Lol...there you go again assuming and speculating, I don't know what it is, but when you show proof more than allegations then we can talk. but It's expected from you, you sure went after Jerry and the team guilty with no proof.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
55,549
Reaction score
36,700
How predictable . We now have fans ready to throw the cheerleaders under the bus and I suppose our owners daughter as well to protect the Star from any ridicule or investigation . And they somehow justify this as a noble cause protecting their team.
 

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
How predictable . We now have fans ready to throw the cheerleaders under the bus and I suppose our owners daughter as well to protect the Star from any ridicule or investigation . And they somehow justify this as a noble cause protecting their team I suppose.

How predictable you foam at the mouth at any little crumb to bash Jerry, proof be damned
 

RonnieT24

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,598
Reaction score
21,688
I’m sure if this was on another team you’d be more suspect but because of the incredible track record and integrity of our owner you find this all difficult to believe I suppose. Just our own cheerleaders looking for a payday:)

In the final analysis isn't that all that happened? No charges were filed.. no one was fired.. all that happened was that they (and their lawyers) got paid. Didn't somebody say "if it quacks like a duck...."
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
55,549
Reaction score
36,700
Lol...there you go again assuming and speculating, I don't know what it is, but when you show proof more than allegations then we can talk. but It's expected from you, you sure went after Jerry and the team guilty with no proof.
Apparently you’re struggling with the entire speculative stance . And the only proof we need is the evidence that’s been provided to present such.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
55,549
Reaction score
36,700
In the final analysis isn't that all that happened? No charges were filed.. no one was fired.. all that happened was that they (and their lawyers) got paid. Didn't somebody say "if it quacks like a duck...."
They also said where there’s fire there’s smoke.

Sounds like you are taking the position that this was a pure money grab by the cheerleaders . Impressive position . Lol
 

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
Apparently you’re struggling with the entire speculative stance . And the only proof we need is the evidence that’s been provided to present such.

Lol what evidence do you have things were done the way they wereb alledged, you're struggling with proof...lol
 

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
Apparently you’re struggling with the entire speculative stance . And the only proof we need is the evidence that’s been provided to present such.

So if it was all this proof, why take the money? After all the girls were distraught and wanted Rich punished.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
55,549
Reaction score
36,700
Lol what evidence do you have things were done the way they wereb alledged, you're struggling with proof...lol
All the proof I need to draw my speculation is what’s been published. If you need more that’s fine. Spin your own stance.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
55,549
Reaction score
36,700
So if it was all this proof, why take the money? After all the girls were distraught and wanted Rich punished.
This is how you punish business in America. You sue them. I applaud the cheerleaders. But instead you’re applauding the pervert. How noble.
 

RonnieT24

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,598
Reaction score
21,688
They also said where there’s fire there’s smoke.

Sounds like you are taking the position that this was a pure money grab by the cheerleaders . Impressive position . Lol

Maybe it was only one.. After all wasn't it only ONE who claimed to have run over and seen Rich running out of the hallway? Didn't the other three just kinda agree? I am asking in earnest because that's what I read and that's the account that I am going on .. If something else has come out please share it. Again, I am not against holding Rich Dalrymple accountable.. I am against destroying any person without due process or some concrete proof other than the word of people who took money to just go away rather seek justice. Others can do that.. I won't. Maybe the reason they took the settlement was because the other three were forced under deposition to admit that they never saw what the fourth girl said she saw and realized that they would be destroyed in court for bringing a lawsuit based on someone else's word that they had been "violated." You know.. since we're speculating here and all.
 

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
This is how you punish business in America. You sue them. I applaud the cheerleaders. But instead you’re applauding the pervert. How noble. Lol

In America you're suppose to be innocent til proven guilty, so I guess you feel all lawsuits are
Legit...lol what workd you live in? I applaud the team for doing a thorough investigation and taking the matter serious. And even though
they found no evidence of wrong doing, I applaud them for easing the girls feeling with 300,000 each. In America there's these little things called settlements that has to be agreed upon by "BOTH" parties and are not an admission of guilt.
 
Top