News: BR: NFL Exec: 'Hard to Pay' Dak Prescott Big Contract After Cowboys' Loss to Purdy, 49ers

bsbellomy

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,367
Reaction score
3,145
100%

Were on year 8 and more than 100 games (plus postseason games).

We know who Dak is.

There is no next level for him. This is who he is.

Dak is squarely somewhere between Kirk Cousins and Derek Carr tier QB, which is actually a bad place for a franchise. They are just good enough that you invest resources, time, and effort into building the franchise around them. The Raiders only just realized Carr wasn’t the guy that was going to lead them to the promise land.
Yeah what sucks is the worst teams in the NFL right now are probably closer to contending than we are.
 

J12B

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,349
Reaction score
22,435
I mean its tough to argue against that. Even if you have confidence in Dak it seems like the Cowboys are trending towards the full picture just not working out. Keep Dak and you probably have to reshuffle the offense once again and probably the head coach.

With that said I think you still need to have a viable replacement, which could be Lance, but that's an unknown. You also have nearly 3/4 of the season left. This team could still get better, and you have to let it play out at least a few more weeks before the discussion is really had.
Mike is gone after this season regardless of what happens with Dak.

Unless they miraculously get to the NFC Championship game.
 

stilltheguru

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,713
Reaction score
13,552
Dak never should have gotten the contract he has now. Dak was never worth $40 million. Remember, in 2019 the Cowboys faced the Eagles for the division lead, and probably the division championship. Dak had an awful game throwing inaccurate passes missing open receivers. The Cowboys scored only 9 points and lost to the Eagles 17-9. The Eagles QB was Carson Wentz. To me, that game was a sign to Jerry, do not pay Dak a big contract. And back then we thought $35 million was a big contract. After Dak got hurt in 2020 missing 11 games or so, Jerry gave Dak $40 million, a no trade clause and a no franchise tag clause when he current contract expires. And, he allowed Dak to make the contract a 4 year deal basically screwing the Cowboys CAP situation.

When Dak is negotiating his new contract we all know he is going to want even more money. But Jerry has no choice but to sign him or let him go via free agency, but he cannot get any compensation for him, other than a 3rd round comp pick. Now, after this game, which is another reminder that Dak is not the guy to win big games, Jerry is behind the 8 ball, but he put himself there.
If they bench dak I'm sure he'd waive that no trade clause
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
I mean its tough to argue against that. Even if you have confidence in Dak it seems like the Cowboys are trending towards the full picture just not working out. Keep Dak and you probably have to reshuffle the offense once again and probably the head coach.

With that said I think you still need to have a viable replacement, which could be Lance, but that's an unknown. You also have nearly 3/4 of the season left. This team could still get better, and you have to let it play out at least a few more weeks before the discussion is really had.
for sure... I do think we know that this Scheme and Dak are not a mix, I'm not sure it works for CD and several others either they just look so out of sync all over..I get that SF defense can do that but man that was bad and has been borderline bad in spots throughout the year.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
If they bench dak I'm sure he'd waive that no trade clause
if he liked the situation he would, the no trade clause just gives the player the power to not go to siberia on a trade..generally once they know you dont want them they are wanting out also.
 

Saluki

Member
Messages
53
Reaction score
81
100%

Were on year 8 and more than 100 games (plus postseason games).

We know who Dak is.

There is no next level for him. This is who he is.

Dak is squarely somewhere between Kirk Cousins and Derek Carr tier QB, which is actually a bad place for a franchise. They are just good enough that you invest resources, time, and effort into building the franchise around them. The Raiders only just realized Carr wasn’t the guy that was going to lead them to the promise land.
Some of us remember late-stage Drew Bledsoe.
 

Hawkeye0202

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,540
Reaction score
43,292
I mean its tough to argue against that. Even if you have confidence in Dak it seems like the Cowboys are trending towards the full picture just not working out. Keep Dak and you probably have to reshuffle the offense once again and probably the head coach.

With that said I think you still need to have a viable replacement, which could be Lance, but that's an unknown. You also have nearly 3/4 of the season left. This team could still get better, and you have to let it play out at least a few more weeks before the discussion is really had.
I agree......but with that said, I'm not sure this new offense is better for him. At least two of the interceptions last night were from slant routes that require pinpoint accuracy and timing. Before the game they showed where is completion percentage is up BUT yards per completion is at a career low. I said before the season, that how well he picks up/plays within this new offense will probably have a big impact on his future as our starting QB.
 

thunderpimp91

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,187
Reaction score
15,660
for sure... I do think we know that this Scheme and Dak are not a mix, I'm not sure it works for CD and several others either they just look so out of sync all over..I get that SF defense can do that but man that was bad and has been borderline bad in spots throughout the year.
Yeah IDK....I've seen some glimpses that make think this offense has the pieces and it fits what Dak does well. I think we are simply limited to a team that plays very well in close games or plays with a lead. Once they fall behind they are not built to come back from multiple possession games.
 
Messages
60
Reaction score
66
Jalen Hurts was available in the second round but the front office didn't draft him in 2020 which was the time to move on from Prescott. Myself and several others on here proposed this resolution.
Yes, but picking Jalen was also controversial at the time if you remember. Many people didn't think he had the ability to throw at an NFL level. Back then, I was thinking more of the Tom Brady route, perhaps you could have rented Brady for a year or two and drafted a QB to develop.
 

Streifenkarl

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,475
Reaction score
3,514
100%

Were on year 8 and more than 100 games (plus postseason games).

We know who Dak is.

There is no next level for him. This is who he is.

Dak is squarely somewhere between Kirk Cousins and Derek Carr tier QB, which is actually a bad place for a franchise. They are just good enough that you invest resources, time, and effort into building the franchise around them. The Raiders only just realized Carr wasn’t the guy that was going to lead them to the promise land.
Good post, my sentiments exactly. Just thought about Carr recently and how he compares to Dak. And the latter is worse.

Need to cut him now to try something different. Might shake up the team too. Continuing to build around this guy just wears down our talent.
 

Adiba1977

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,910
Reaction score
3,713
He’s got 12 games to play better and win couple games playoffs. Any decent gm/team would move on but dumb and dumber will likely extend him. Just move on
 
Top