Why the extreme points of view on Dak?

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
57,367
Reaction score
35,386
The second time Dak has created the need for a whole dedicated 'zone' for discussion.

Agree we don't need multiple threads a day on this piece of trash.
It’s the fans like you who keep bashing him for why we need a Dak zone. Any fan who would call him trash wasn’t following the Cowboys when they actually had trash at QB. Those years led to a number of losing seasons and only one playoff appearance.
 

Kingofholland

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,938
Reaction score
6,340
I understand the various schools of thought on Dak (pro and con) but what I can’t quite wrap my mind around is that people ignore the cap implications of a Dak extension.

I would say that MOST intelligent people realize that most people would want Dak to stick around for a low enough cap hit and most would want Dak to go away at a high enough cap number. The rubber meeting the road with Dak is mostly his cap impact going forward.

The worst situation with Dak isn’t keeping Dak or trading Dak away, or letting Dak walk away in free agency. The worst situation is wrecking the cap with a Dak signing so badly that the team has no chance of competing for a SB with Dak’s cap number.

You can argue at what point the cap number gets too prohibitive to keep Dak but based on the evidence we have in front of us (no Dak extension) that Dak’s demands exceed what the organization thinks that number is.
Good and fair assessment. You're spot on it does come down to money and if Dak was willing to accept a reasonable contract with incentives for playoff success I'm sure you would have many more onboard.
 

FanofJerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,935
Reaction score
1,133
Is it possible that GM Jethro is going to let this year play out then resign Dak, CD and Micah next year, back load all their contracts and then go all in on FA's to make a 2 to 3 year run???
I dont know anything about what is doable and what isnt...

But that would make sense...you would have all 3 in their primes.

Assuming they can manipulate the books enough to add quality starters/depth.

If it doesnt work...blow it up.
 

Chasing6

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,446
Reaction score
3,289
I dont know anything about what is doable and what isnt...

But that would make sense...you would have all 3 in their primes.

Assuming they can manipulate the books enough to add quality starters/depth.

If it doesnt work...blow it up.
It just seems strange to me to blow it up without going completely all in first.
 

Big_D

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,976
Reaction score
15,048
It just seems strange to me to blow it up without going completely all in first.
It makes no sense at all. They look completely inept at this point. Years of poor decisions culminated into a giant ball of crap when a little common sense would've made a huge difference.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
It’s the fans like you who keep bashing him for why we need a Dak zone. Any fan who would call him trash wasn’t following the Cowboys when they actually had trash at QB. Those years led to a number of losing seasons and only one playoff appearance.
yeah he is one that is here for BS not football talk
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,063
Reaction score
27,417
Is it possible that GM Jethro is going to let this year play out then resign Dak, CD and Micah next year, back load all their contracts and then go all in on FA's to make a 2 to 3 year run???
Sure but the Cowboys are holding firm seeing their last signing's mistake. Dak can improve. It is unlikely at his age but MM has a track record working with older QBs and elevating their games.

Failing that and a repeat of last years performance or worse is unlikely to see that unless Dak lowers his asking price significantly.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,063
Reaction score
27,417
It just seems strange to me to blow it up without going completely all in first.
They routinely talk about going for sustainable success. If you do not agree with it fine but to not understand why they act as they do, when they have been telling us why they do not mortgage to the hilt, is not a good look.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
Sure but the Cowboys are holding firm seeing their last signing's mistake. Dak can improve. It is unlikely at his age but MM has a track record working with older QBs and elevating their games.

Failing that and a repeat of last years performance or worse is unlikely to see that unless Dak lowers his asking price significantly.
That is true and Dak's camp has no reason not to go to FA and pull Jerry into it...I'll wait for the modern football player to "Give his team a discount" because this is not reality.
 

Zekeats

theranchsucks
Messages
12,918
Reaction score
15,338
I understand the various schools of thought on Dak (pro and con) but what I can’t quite wrap my mind around is that people ignore the cap implications of a Dak extension.

I would say that MOST intelligent people realize that most people would want Dak to stick around for a low enough cap hit and most would want Dak to go away at a high enough cap number. The rubber meeting the road with Dak is mostly his cap impact going forward.

The worst situation with Dak isn’t keeping Dak or trading Dak away, or letting Dak walk away in free agency. The worst situation is wrecking the cap with a Dak signing so badly that the team has no chance of competing for a SB with Dak’s cap number.

You can argue at what point the cap number gets too prohibitive to keep Dak but based on the evidence we have in front of us (no Dak extension) that Dak’s demands exceed what the organization thinks that number is.
If you pay him $2 a season he still can't win. He's not a good QB. He is a fraud.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,063
Reaction score
27,417
That is true and Dak's camp has no reason not to go to FA and pull Jerry into it...I'll wait for the modern football player to "Give his team a discount" because this is not reality.
The league needs to stand firm and not pay second tier QBs top tier prices. That is the reality now for the past 8 years or so. At that point it is not a point about giving a discount but the buyers of the market pulling their head out of their backsides and bringing sanity to the market.
 

Chasing6

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,446
Reaction score
3,289
They routinely talk about going for sustainable success. If you do not agree with it fine but to not understand why they act as they do, when they have been telling us why they do not mortgage to the hilt, is not a good look.
What they have done this off season is definitely not what they normally do. Something is definitely different this off season.

And pretending to be mortgage to the hilt, when they say they don't want to be mortgage to the hilt is definitely not a good look.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,063
Reaction score
27,417
What they have done this off season is definitely not what they normally do. Something is definitely different this off season.

And pretending to be mortgage to the hilt, when they say they don't want to be mortgage to the hilt is definitely not a good look.
Just because the OTC cap calculator says they can extend all the roster for an all in does not make it good policy.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
The league needs to stand firm and not pay second tier QBs top tier prices. That is the reality now for the past 8 years or so. At that point it is not a point about giving a discount but the buyers of the market pulling their head out of their backsides and bringing sanity to the market.
ooh absolutley..the GM/Owners created this QB problem.. but now its the "Face of our business" and they have no idea what to do about it.
 

acr731

Jerry learned to GM from Pee Wee Herman
Messages
8,666
Reaction score
24,113
Even AC wants Dak to take a slight "discount".
I take it with a grain of salt whenever he says that. If Dallas got rid of Dak I have no doubt he would try to burn the entire state of Texas down in protest.
 

Chasing6

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,446
Reaction score
3,289
Just because the OTC cap calculator says they can extend all the roster for an all in does not make it good policy.
Thanks for explaining that. I was not aware.

Does the OTC cap calculator say to let all your free agents go and and to sign basically none in the offseason?
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,063
Reaction score
27,417
ooh absolutley..the GM/Owners created this QB problem.. but now its the "Face of our business" and they have no idea what to do about it.
not signing second tier QBs to top tier prices as the Cowboys appear to be doing is "what to do about it."

Eagles cannot be feeling good about hurts deal and their are a litany of deals signed the past few years that franchises have indicated serious buyers remorse in retrospect. Not so many stories going the other way.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,063
Reaction score
27,417
Thanks for explaining that. I was not aware.

Does the OTC cap calculator say to let all your free agents go and and to sign basically none in the offseason?
So you have not even looked at the accounting and come with this? :lmao:
 
Top