Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
- Messages
- 62,498
- Reaction score
- 67,317
No, it was another reporter at ESPN.Didnt werder report that Doug Marrone was out in Jacksonville last week?![]()
No, it was another reporter at ESPN.Didnt werder report that Doug Marrone was out in Jacksonville last week?![]()
ESPN: Trust Us!No, it was another reporter at ESPN.
Yes.I keep hearing this "no love lost for Garrett by Stevie-Boy", but where is that directly coming from?
Our minds?
There are no trustworthy media, part of their job is to be first and also the most controversial. Fair, prudent and honest does not mean job security.ESPN: Trust Us!
My dude @cern is the worst of this attribution, but others are guilty and I see no reason why.Yes.
People love to ascribe traits to Stephen Jones that are the opposite of his father to make themselves more equipped to deal with the idiocy.
Maybe they leaked it to calm the fan base down and now they're doing what they intended to do all along. Nothing. lol
Man, that would be the ultimate punk of your own fan base.
You get eliminated from the playoffs and the fans want Jason's head so you intentionally leak bad info to ESPN that Garrett is gone and you let that report just linger out there for the entire weekend letting the fans think he is gone and then you call a presser next week and say what?
"You fans all got punked, I'm keeping Clappy after all"...…………...yeah, the fan base would get a big laugh out of that, it would be hilarious.![]()
Man, that would be the ultimate punk of your own fan base.
You get eliminated from the playoffs and the fans want Jason's head so you intentionally leak bad info to ESPN that Garrett is gone and you let that report just linger out there for the entire weekend letting the fans think he is gone and then you call a presser next week and say what?
"You fans all got punked, I'm keeping Clappy after all"...…………...yeah, the fan base would get a big laugh out of that, it would be hilarious.![]()
I keep hearing this "no love lost for Garrett by Stevie-Boy", but where is that directly coming from?
Our minds?
Hey we gotta have hope for the future!Yes.
People love to ascribe traits to Stephen Jones that are the opposite of his father to make themselves more equipped to deal with the idiocy.
He might be jealous of Garrett.Well there have been at least 4 occasions when Stephen went on his radio show and basically gave ultimatums for Garrett.
Statements like "he needs to get the team over the hump", "nobody wants Jason to coach the Cowboys more than me but we have not had any playoff success in a very long time and that needs to change and Jason understands that", ect....
Also, I didnt see Stephen crying like a baby after Garrett spit the bit and lost game after game down the stretch.
So, it does not take a huge leap in logic to deduct that Stephen has no where close to the emotional attachment to Garrett that his dad has.
Even if it is completely unfounded in fact?Hey we gotta have hope for the future!
I'd have more faith in Stephen if he didn't crave media attention like his dad.Even if it is completely unfounded in fact?
Okay then.
And that shows zip that he has firm control, or is taking over in a general and everyday sense.Well there have been at least 4 occasions when Stephen went on his radio show and basically gave ultimatums for Garrett.
Statements like "he needs to get the team over the hump", "nobody wants Jason to coach the Cowboys more than me but we have not had any playoff success in a very long time and that needs to change and Jason understands that", ect....
Also, I didnt see Stephen crying like a baby after Garrett spit the bit and lost game after game down the stretch.
So, it does not take a huge leap in logic to deduct that Stephen has no where close to the emotional attachment to Garrett that his dad has.
He craves attention, but in a different way.I'd have more faith in Stephen if he didn't crave media attention like his dad.
He might be jealous of Garrett.