The original poster makes his arguments in support of Greg Ellis very well, I just do not agree with them. I understand WHY Greg Ellis is crying for an extension, I just do not believe that he merits a new contract. I do not remember Ellis whining that he was woefully underpaid when he signed his current contract. He was happy with the contract when he signed it, or he would not have signed it.
I seriously do not understand the thought process of many of the posters here who support Ellis' position on getting a big pay day when he is coming off a major injury. In reality, Ellis might not ever play football again.
If that is the case, the Cowboys won't be getting back any of the signing bonus they gave him, even if they were to cut or trade him, resulting in a windfall to Ellis for the time he was employed by the cowboys. Even if Ellis hadn't been injured last year, he does not "deserve" a new contract. He "deserves" to play out the one he signed.
The fact that he was the leading sack leader for the Cowboys for many years is not so much a feather in his cap as it is a knock on the state of the woeful Cowboys' teams since Ellis was drafted. None of those teams will be confused with the Ravens team that won the superbowl.
Ellis has been a steady solid player. I will also agree that he fits in the mold of a player that New England might have selected, as far as his performance has been steady and at an above average level. But players of Ellis' caliber are usually selected in the latter part of round one, not the eighth overall pick. You should expect to get an IMPACT player at the eighth pick, not just a solid performer. The draft value chart (although somewhat out of touch with reality as well) indicates the premium teams place on such a high pick.
Ellis wasn't a horrible pick, but to say that he has been anything other than solid, so far, is a bit of a stretch.