AJM1613 said:
I was comparing McNabb to the best, that is why I compared the stats. All I was saying that I would rather have a guy who throws 9 interceptions and 57% a season than a guy who throws 18 and 63% completion rate.
No, you were trying to justify McNabb's low completion percentage by suggesting that he throws the ball away more than Manning. You tried to suggest that Manning's high completion percentage is related to his higher interception total.
I also checked your stats and realized that you were getting McNabb's 10 interceptions by dividing his total interceptions (49) by his number of years in the league. If you want to accurately compare their interceptions, you should adjust for their number of games started. Manning has started all 96 games of his six-year career. McNabb has started 64, so his interception total is equivalent to 12 per year.
Or, on the basis of attempts, McNabb has a 2.3% interception percentage, while Manning has a 3.2% interception for his career. Note that Manning's interception percentage is heavily weighted by his rookie season, in which he threw 28 interceptions. By comparison, he threw only 10 last year.
Basically, McNabb, despite running the ball more than most quarterbacks, taking more sacks than most quarterbacks, and throwing more passes to running backs, has a mediocre completion percentage. The stats bear out what most are able to conclude by visual inspection: McNabb is a relatively inaccurate passer. It has nothing to do with throwing the ball away.
BTW, I would rather have the QB with the career 88 passer rating than the one with the career 79 passer rating.
Also, Westbrook lines up at WR some times, you have to factor that in too.
Can you provide any data on how many passes Westbrook caught from the wide receiver position? Even an estimate on the percentage of passes he caught from WR? I'd think 25% would be a generous estimate.
If he caught 25% of his passes from the WR position, then about 33% of Philly's completions went to backs. Still much higher than Indy's 20%.
Your obvious attempts to skew stats to the favor of McNabb undermine any credibility you have. Just accept the fact that McNabb is a mediocre passer, and you'll have a much happier existence on these boards.
IMO, McNabb brings a lot more to the position than his passing ability, which is what makes him *the* playmaker on the Eagles offense. Just don't sell us a line of BS about what a great passer he is.