Brock Purdy's potential contract vs Dak's contract

[SlammedZero]

You spend too much time worrying about Dak critics and not enough about what’s best for the cowboys.

I believed in Dak for a long time. But I always just wanted what’s best for the cowboys. Not to “own” people who didn’t like Dak.

In regards to Purdy. I think it would be a mistake for the niners to re-sign him to a massive deal. Just like Jerry made a massive mistake in re-signing Dak at the final hour this off season.

Great post! I swear, some people are just lying to themselves, trying to convince themselves that Dak is the guy. I rooted for Dak for years and stood up for him, too. But eventually, someone shows you who they really are. After that second playoff game against San Francisco, I finally realized what I was seeing: a quarterback who will never be able to carry a team, especially in the face of adversity. He just doesn’t have it in him.

 

[visionary]

Greedy Dak wanted ‘respect’ LOL
I guess Purdy doesn’t need respect or feed his family

 

[RoboQB]

I'm confident that the QB that led his team to 2 NFC Championship Games and a Super Bowl will be paid well.
He's earned it. I'd bet that he will not be worried about being highest paid. My guess is top 5.

 

[atlantacowboy]

I wouldn’t bet on it. Shanny can draft someone to come in and run that system. The Niners secret sauce is a cheap, effective system QB which allows them to load up on defense and offensive skill positions. Why would they change it ?

 

[America's Cowboy]

You said over and over again this past offseason that you would be done defending Dak if he received a record setting deal.

Grow a freaking backbone and stand behind your words!

Sheesh.

I'm not defending Dak's overpaid contract, but the truth is he can still perform well and is here for another 4 years, so grow a pair and accept the fact Dak is here to stay whether you like it or not! If you can't handle it, GO FOLLOW ANOTHER TEAM!!!

 

[America's Cowboy]

You spend too much time worrying about Dak critics and not enough about what’s best for the cowboys.

I believed in Dak for a long time. But I always just wanted what’s best for the cowboys. Not to “own” people who didn’t like Dak.

In regards to Purdy. I think it would be a mistake for the niners to re-sign him to a massive deal. Just like Jerry made a massive mistake in re-signing Dak at the final hour this off season.

Dak is still this team's best option, hence why he was extended. Name me your option. I need a very good laugh.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Problem with your take is Dak had pretty much all that a couple times in his career and guess what... accomplished less than Purdy did with comparable talent around him.

Let's not act like the Cowboys have been completely devoid of anything and everything other than Dak for 8+ years. Because you know that is a lie.

Besides weren't you Dogging Dak and his look not too long ago? I will never understand someone who flips flops at a whim.

The few times Dak had those elements around him, Dak actually performed well during those playoff games. The losses happened not because of Dak but because of those other elements not pulling their weight. If anything, Dak carried the team during those playoff games. Do I need to show you videos to remind you, or do you enjoy acting as if you've got dementia?

One thing I can't stand is a bonafied liar who falsely points fingers at the wrong player.

 

[America's Cowboy]

He needs them ALL. When he was under $30m CAP, in 2023, he was unable to elevate the team sufficiently to overcome the shaky run defense, what makes you think he'll be able to do it now his CAP hit doubles?
The problem with the run defense, when using it in relation to Dak, is that as the clock ticks down everyone can see the fight go out of Dak's game.... he's no comeback kid.
Don't know whether Purdy can succeed with the elite contract (as we haven't seen it as yet), unfortunately, Dak's vote has been cast and he comes up short.

Really? More lies? Do I need to show you videos to make you look bad?

 

[America's Cowboy]

Well Purdy is the better Quarterback.

Really? How so? Dak has the better stats.

 

[HungryLion]

Dak is still this team's best option, hence why he was extended. Name me your option. I need a very good laugh.

I personally don’t care if you still believe in Dak or not that’s your prerogative.

That being said your response just proves the point of my first post. You’re less concerned about about the best direction for the Cowboys than you are concerned about trying to own people who disagree with you.

 

[America's Cowboy]

I personally don’t care if you still believe in Dak or not that’s your prerogative.

That being said your response just proves the point of my first post. You’re less concerned about about the best direction for the Cowboys than you are concerned about trying to own people who disagree with you.

Step up to the plate and name me your better option? Come on. Let's see how smart you are.

 

[HungryLion]

Step up to the plate and name me your better option? Come on. Let's see how smart you are.

I’m ready for the Cowboys to move on and draft somebody.

I’m well aware that finding a good QB in the draft is difficult but I’m ready to accept that risk because the current status quo isn’t getting the job done.

Like I said. I don’t care if you like Dak. Keep liking Dak, go for it. No skin off my back.

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

Really? How so? Dak has the better stats.

In the Playoffs?

 

[KingCorcoran]

Before the Dak contract, we were discussing the length of the deal as a big characteristic of how team friendly it was. Dak ended up taking another 4 year deal which ends up completely screwing the team.

If Purdy ends up taking a very team friendly deal that delays the cap hits and give SF a long window, its going to say something negative about Dak. It’s one thing to want your $$$. It’s another to try to do it in a way that maximizes the damage to your own team. Mahomes took a 10 year deal or something because of this. Dak keeps demanding short deals.

“If Purdy ends up taking a very team friendly deal that delays the cap hits and gives SF a long window, it’s going to say something negative about” Jerry Jones. The 49ers’ ownership group seems significantly more competent than Jerry Jones and his offspring. Purdy will sign a deal commensurate with his value to the San Francisco 49ers. Niners ownership will not be guided by Jerry Jones’ decisions.

Thinking otherwise is just Cowboys fans’ fantasy.

 

[Steve007]

When Brock Purdy does set the QB market, what excuses are the Dak critics going to come up with?

Purdy > Dak What excuses are the daklovers going to come up with when he gets less than Dak?

 

[GINeric]

Purdy may not be determined to reset the QB market but he’ll have a good argument considering he’s led SF to a Conference title game and a SB.

Based on what you said, Trent Dilpher should have been paid more than Dan Marino and Jim Kelly because Dilpher led his team to a Superbowl victory and Kelly and Marino didn't.

Am I right?

 

[KingCorcoran]

Step up to the plate and name me your better option? Come on. Let's see how smart you are.

You’re right, of course. There was no better option. The step back Jerry would have had to take sans Dak would guarantee he’d likely pass away before the Cowboys had a viable quarterback. The $60 million AAV is the result of a contractual situation Jerry agreed to that took trade and tag off the table.

If we’re being honest, and few here like to be, Dak Prescott is quality. Quality. He’s a close as the Cowboys are going to get to it for awhile. It is frustrating.

 

[Wildcat711]

Really? How so? Dak has the better stats.

Stats smats.. great players come up big in the moments that matter.

Unfortunately Dak doesn't seem to do that.. (mind you nor does anyone else on this team appear to)

 

[KJJ]

Based on what you said, Trent Dilpher should have been paid more than Dan Marino and Jim Kelly because Dilpher led his team to a Superbowl victory and Kelly and Marino didn't.

Am I right?

Dilfer never “led” anyone to a SB victory. He was carried to a SB victory by a team that had one of the all time great defenses. This is why he was released immediately after that SB. Purdy has been a lot better than Dilfer. He’s been a big part of leading SF to a couple of title games and a SB. Plus he’s 2-0 against Dak. He’ll use all of that as leverage.

 

[GINeric]

Dilfer never “led” anyone to a SB victory. He was carried to a SB victory by a team that had one of the all time great defenses. This is why he was released immediately after that SB. Purdy has been a lot better than Dilfer. He’s been a big part of leading SF to a couple of title games and a SB. Plus he’s 2-0 against Dak. He’ll use all of that as leverage.

Well Dilpher has a Superbowl victory on his resume. I know there are only wins and losses in a category for all quarterbacks.

No matter how the game is played, all I hear from people is how one quarterback is better than another quarterback because one quarterback has a championship game or a Superbowl on his resume as an argument as too why he's worth more than another quarterback.

So again.... we can't switch rules for quarterbacks. Because we all know damn well that Purdy couldn't have "led" any of these other teams to a Superbowl without that roster and that great offensive mind in K. Shanahan.