***CBA APPROVED - 102m Cap***

All I can think of is that they would increase the size of the practice squad- or maybe reduce the number of players that count against the cap. As a way to save money. Seems pretty drastic.
 
Robocop.gif


I can't take this crap anymore...someone give me a beer.
 
BigDFan5 said:
My son when this started

baby.png





My son and his wife now

YoungSoldier_OldMan2.jpg


:bow:


1st place......a golden Dr Pepper bottle is in the mail.
 
Moose is the guy that mentioned the 45 player thing. Some wild stuff running around. The twit on ESPN just totally misquoted Jerry- he said that it was clsoe and that something would happen in a half hour= NOT THAT IT WAS GOING THAT WELL. TWIT.
 
BigDFan5 said:
YES!! They Like me they really like me


Well let's not get carried away here :rolleyes: .....We liked the joke and pictures....:D
 
I'm not sure they can change the existing contract at all without Players blessing. There is a contract still in place.Isn't all this about EXTENDING the CBA.

45 players sounds like they are getting ready to strong arm what happens down the line if players don't come to Jesus?
 
DrunkWithPower said:
The revenue debate involves low-income teams such as Buffalo, Cincinnati and Indianapolis who say high-revenue teams -- Dallas, Washington and Philadelphia, for instance -- should contribute proportionately to the player pool because they can earn far more in non-football income such as advertising and local radio rights.
If I read this particular paragraph in another article...I'll...I'll...:shootme: :shoot1: :shoot2: :shoot3:




:D
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
463,902
Messages
13,776,210
Members
23,769
Latest member
1977fan
Back
Top