I can see them using Spencer on the weakside. Will they? I'm not sure... but he certainly could play there.
At 6-3, 250 pounds Marinelli might see him as a weakside end. If so, that would put our current ends (and tackles) as most likely:
WDE - Spencer/Selvie/Mincey
DT - Melton/Kearse
DT - McClain/Hayden
SDE - Crawford/Bass/Mincey
Going into the draft, Dallas could literally use a high pick or two on either DE and either DT without blinking an eye. IMO, Tackle is the slightly bigger need.
If Dallas drafted (for instance):
Aaron Donald in round 1
and
Scott Crichton in round 2
then Crichton goes strongside to compete with Crawford/Mincey, and Bass goes inside to compete at DT.
The DT's would likely be Donald, Melton, McClain and Hayden/Bass or another draft pick like Caraun Reid.
Spencer/Selvie/Mincey would play on the weakside.
That would provide a lot of competition and versatility along the defensive line. If Spencer made it back ok from the injury, we would actually be pretty damn good at WDE. If he didn't, then Selvie/Mincey would likely provide, at worst, a solid rotation there.
excellent. we have gotten to the point where we are not forced into drafting DL in round 1. no shante carver nightmare scenarios
I see it more like this:
SDE - Spencer/Selvie/Mincey
DT - Melton/Bass
DT - McClain/Hayden/Crawford
SDE - Draft Pick/Mincey/Selvie
I see it more like this:
SDE - Spencer/Selvie/Mincey
DT - Melton/Bass
DT - McClain/Hayden/Crawford
SDE - Draft Pick/Mincey/Selvie
Nah. They are going after John AbrahamMy guess Spencer and Jeremy Mincy are battling for one roster spot...... I still think they are gonna try and make a deal for Anthony Barr
On talkin cowboys they said that he has been running on a treadmill, just not on his own. Apparently it doesn't stress it as much on a treadmill.
Based on what, exactly?
I couldn't disagree more about WDE. I don't think we have anyone suited for the WDE right now. Spencer has the size but he's coming off microfracture surgey. And Selvie had his most success at SDE. I don't see why we would spend a high pick on SDE and not WDE. I would go Ford/Attachou/Lawrence over Crichton/Ealy/Tuitt. I also think WDE is a bigger need than DT, but Donald is clearly the best player in the draft for us, so if he's available you take him.
Both ends are on the strong side?
You and I tend to agree more than disagree and in this situation I think I am just looking at it a little different than you are.
I agree that we need WDE more than SDE in the draft, but if you're talking about a second round player, I like Crichton an awful lot. I don't like Ealy or Tuitt at all, period. Ford and Attaochu I like a lot as well. Either of them would be more than fine with me and maybe would be the smarter move for Dallas, like you say. I am certainly not above having my mind changed.
I didn't list Ford because I think he will be gone in round 1 and since in the example I used Donald as our first, I ruled him out. Attaochu would be good for us in the second and I would be more than happy with Donald and Attaochu in my example with Spencer playing on the strongside.
You also made a good point in a later post than the one I quoted, when you said that although Spencer is the size of a weakside end, that he is stout against the run and his speed/quickness might be lessened because of the microfracture surgery. The Spencer of two years ago, I would play on the weakside... the Spencer we have now might be best at strongside.
So, while I do like Crichton an awful lot and think that he might be the BPA at our pick (and we shouldn't skip a SDE just because we have more people there)... I also like Attaochu a lot and think it would be a good move getting him on the weakside, which I agree is a bigger need.
So, your point is well taken.