I wonder what the wording was in the “recent report” that Ochoa is referring to.
Having a coach in a contract year and not at least playing out possible scenarios as to what may occur if he doesn’t re-sign, would be nothing short of complete negligence. I truly believe there had to be top brass (Jerry and…who knows) in meetings that discussed an action plan that should have been set in motion months ago. The plan didn’t have to result in a “this guy or bust” conclusion, but potential candidates and what’s our key criteria of those candidates had to be discussed, right? How could the man in charge of staffing and player personnel be caught off-guard by not being able to retain the services of an individual in a contact year?
To those that say, “what’s the big deal?” I’d say you’re partially correct. Fortunately, the organization isn’t completely behind the 8-ball at this point, and there are plenty of potential hires to line up for interviews. Where the ho-hum thinking is flawed is if we take Ochoa’s comments at 100% face value, and the Jones’ really have given zero thought of this happening (for what…close to year?) right up to point of Sausage Boy & Yucko the Clown parting ways. That would be just another nail in the “What would you say it is that you do here, Jerry?” coffin.
Most likely though, Ochoa is sensationalizing his statement knowing nothing makes more noise than generating material that presents Jerry Jones as the Washington Generals of NFL ownership. Kind of low-hanging fruit, that if played to often, makes the author look the part of a simpleton.