I never thought the criteria was only applied to Dak, and I don't even know if this analyst included the passes that I think were inaccuracies more than drops. I just know that some of the ones that were debated during the season were very difficult catches. Granted, there probably was not more than a handful of those out of the ones considered drops.
Fair enough. We as fans debating our opinions on games and what was catchable not catchable makes total sense to me. I didn’t mean to come at you personally
There just seemed to be folks somehow debating that this guy wasn’t exercising analytical rigor and would somehow use different definitions of catchable/uncatchable or drop/miss across his sample.
It just didn’t make sense
We, as fans, all have our own biases and opinions. Guys like this who are trying to make a living on analytics can’t afford that.
I used to mod at realgm and some of the designers of the tools used there went on to get real jobs in the NBA based on their salary cap tools and analysis. It was fascinating and I assure you, they viewed themselves as potential consultants more than they saw themselves as fans.
Same thing is the angle for this guy
Nate Silver (fivethirtyeight) is an icon/idol for these guys
To get paid to do stats for sports, a hobby they would and did do for free? It’s a dream come true
For people to suggest he would sabotage his entire professional goals, not to mention what is obviously a passion project, to somehow prop up this lame or that is silly
More likely they just didn’t take the time to think it through, which is fine. It’s a message board and some folks rightfully just want to pop off with an opinion or two and not have to fine tune every post
I’m plenty guilty of that myself from time to time