The cap numbers are important. I know you have discounted them for so long claiming there is no one for the cowboys to acquirer out there. Well, guess who did some acquisitions and won the super bowl .
Stafford was keen on dallas as an option but dallas never wavered on dak for some blind ego reason. The result is the rams have a ring and we are hanging on the dak hope you !!
And yes i agree , dak is not the biggest FO mistake,. zeke, Dlaw, amari and others are much bigger mistakes than dak. But i guarantee you, if jerry had engaged stafford ( a dallas native) and let dak walk , we would be in a much better shape.
You keep saying cap is not an issue: well we are losing talent like amari and soon others due to the cap. Be realistic ,and admit the predicament of Dak's contract besides the other misrakes.
I have not discounted the cap. where you and some of the dak haters like yourself keep mentioning 40M cap hit, and not understanding the difference between cap hit and average salary over life of a contract. everyone has to deal with dead cap money at some point, and sometimes all at once (rebuild). what Rams did was sign the right players, mortgage future without draft picks, all for winning a superbowl. worth it if it works. it did for them. didn't for a few others...they will eventually have to pay some of these players and that's when they have to make tough decisions. they did pay goff a contract worth 33M per year, which was the highest at the time.
now, tell me again how 17M cap hit handicapped us? and his cap hit for 2022 is about 18M. I know about future disaster looming for dead cap. but how is these cap hits handicapping us?
stafford may have been keen on dallas. who isn't. they all like to come here and make money and get their paycheck. the problem is that Rams were more superbowl ready with the right QB, than dallas. that was the only thing holding them back. now, I am sure you and some like you will point to us in 2021 and playoff performance against SF and ask would stafford played like that!? , forgetting that if we would have made the trade for Stafford couple of years back as you said, there wouldn't be a diggs, parsons or CD and that wouldn't be the same team. as I said, we would have been Detroit south, with similar results.
btw, its your main assumption that Stafford was available for a trade couple of years back, which is far from the facts and reality.
and in regards to your last comment, we might have been in better shape at QB position, but we would be worse off the rest of the team. and end result would have been the same.
oh, and most importantly don't forget Rams have McVay and we had Garrett. now tell me that if Garrett was head coach of the rams, then they would be superbowl winners this year. come on, tell me if that would be the case.
like I said, you all play fantasy football, just moving pieces in and out and counting fantasy points
disclaimer: By no means I am defending Dak and his play or his ability. this is solely about cap, salary cap management, and signing the right players and having the right coach