kskboys
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 47,972
- Reaction score
- 50,824
MM, I would presume.who is the scapegoat?
MM, I would presume.who is the scapegoat?
As would every GM in the NFL.Trevor Lawrence is more talented than Dak, and making do with less around him. He's also MUCH YOUNGER than Dak, so he has tons more upside. It's almost certain lawrence will accomplish more than Dak when it is all said and done.
I'd take Lawrence right now over Dak without any hesitation whatsoever.
Yes.Talent is the APLHA and the OMEGA for any player no matter the sport.
It is also the primary reason we have been bounced like a toy from player-caliber teams: we lack talent at the most important position on the field.
QB............................
You guys are caught up in the hype.. How many of these long haired Barbies have to come into the league, do nothing and then leave the league before you acknowledge that they are not as good as Dak? They don't throw the ball as well, they don't read defenses as well and they don't play the position as well. MAYBE they have stronger arms? Who cares? When football velocity and distance become Olympic sports I will care about that but given that the guy with 7 Super Bowl rings had average arm strength at best I'm gonna stick with guy who can put the ball where it needs to be more often than not, often with people hanging all over him. When one of the Barbies demonstrates they can do that on a consistent basis I will concede that they are better than Dak. Until then.. G T F ... you know the rest.As would every GM in the NFL.
Yup. Same QB. 2nd tier QBs must have more around them to win. And this must be recognized w/ an accurate assessment and savvy acquisition of D players to make up for the inconsistencies that 2nd tier QB's have. It's not about giving them more weapons, a mistake that teams keep making, it's about giving them a D so the mistakes they make can be glossed over.Yes.
Romo included.
IDK, how many have to overrate Dak and hang all over him all the time? G T F.......you know the rest.You guys are caught up in the hype.. How many of these long haired Barbies have to come into the league, do nothing and then leave the league before you acknowledge that they are not as good as Dak? They don't throw the ball as well, they don't read defenses as well and they don't play the position as well. MAYBE they have stronger arms? Who cares? When football velocity and distance become Olympic sports I will care about that but given that the guy with 7 Super Bowl rings had average arm strength at best I'm gonna stick with guy who can put the ball where it needs to be more often than not, often with people hanging all over him. When one of the Barbies demonstrates they can do that on a consistent basis I will concede that they are better than Dak. Until then.. G T F ... you know the rest.
MM, the HC did not have the team ready/.yep it was a full on team no show, thats a problem that goes much deeper than "Replace this player" nope the GM needs to be on trial for that mess along with everyone else..after 28 years of this its hard to place the blame anywhere else...
When will you be okay giving one of these “Barbie’s” a chance to prove they are better?You guys are caught up in the hype.. How many of these long haired Barbies have to come into the league, do nothing and then leave the league before you acknowledge that they are not as good as Dak? They don't throw the ball as well, they don't read defenses as well and they don't play the position as well. MAYBE they have stronger arms? Who cares? When football velocity and distance become Olympic sports I will care about that but given that the guy with 7 Super Bowl rings had average arm strength at best I'm gonna stick with guy who can put the ball where it needs to be more often than not, often with people hanging all over him. When one of the Barbies demonstrates they can do that on a consistent basis I will concede that they are better than Dak. Until then.. G T F ... you know the rest.
Long haired Barbies...wow, who would have guessed you of all people would come up with that.You guys are caught up in the hype.. How many of these long haired Barbies have to come into the league, do nothing and then leave the league before you acknowledge that they are not as good as Dak? They don't throw the ball as well, they don't read defenses as well and they don't play the position as well. MAYBE they have stronger arms? Who cares? When football velocity and distance become Olympic sports I will care about that but given that the guy with 7 Super Bowl rings had average arm strength at best I'm gonna stick with guy who can put the ball where it needs to be more often than not, often with people hanging all over him. When one of the Barbies demonstrates they can do that on a consistent basis I will concede that they are better than Dak. Until then.. G T F ... you know the rest.
Mahomes did take less, and the brilliant thing was the 10 year contract which allows the chiefs to move $ around as they need to.2024 through 2027 Mahomes will be paid $215.6 million. That is, at present, more than any other player in the NFL will get over the next four seasons. Stop with the Mahomes took less. The Chiefs have made sure he’s taken care of.
So do the Barbies not play in the NFL? Seems to me they get 17 chances a year to prove they are better. You can spew your ABD agenda till the cows come home and it will carry the same weight as your proclamation that the Cowboys offense would be better with Andy Dalton after Dak got hurt and that the Cowboys would not sign him after the franchise tag year or my all time favorite, "rumors are Dak's leg is not healing and he may never play again.." Those being your greatest hits. You will probably never top those.. but feel free to keep trying.When will you be okay giving one of these “Barbie’s” a chance to prove they are better?
You’re a “Dak for life” guy.
So much so that you spent 5 weeks making threads about Cooper Rush being bad while on a 4 game winning streak.
You don’t want anyone to get a chance over your precious loser QB. Everyone knows Ronnie is Dak over Dallas.
having JG for HC, was like having a big lead weight around his neck.Romo is more talented, but that’s not saying much.
Romo is still a loser QB that was never good enough when it nattered.
bothScared or incompetently unprepared???
I wasn’t even a member of this site when Dalton was our QB or when Dak broke his leg.So do the Barbies not play in the NFL? Seems to me they get 17 chances a year to prove they are better. You can spew your ABD agenda till the cows come home and it will carry the same weight as your proclamation that the Cowboys offense would be better with Andy Dalton after Dak got hurt and that the Cowboys would not sign him after the franchise tag year or my all time favorite, "rumors are Dak's leg is not healing and he may never play again.." Those being your greatest hits. You will probably never top those.. but feel free to keep trying.
About as hard as it is to overcome losers like Dak and Romo.having JG for HC, was like having a big lead weight around his neck.
Dak had JG then MM, so neither qb has had the benefit of a good HC, but instead the negatives of having a bad HC.
It is hard to overcome a bad HC.
Fine... list me all the things these "more talented" guys do better than Dak on the football field when live bullets are flying. The numbers are out there.. accuracy, off target and on target throw percentages, throws under pressure.. in addition to all the normal metrics like completion percentage, TDs, INTs, yards and such. Go ahead and delineate which of these areas these "more talented" guys surpass Dak at. If you don't do it, I will later when I have some time. It should make an interesting study.IDK, how many have to overrate Dak and hang all over him all the time? G T F.......you know the rest.
Good for the Chiefs. But Mahomes‘ cash flow is stronger than any other player in the league over the next four years, and he has the third highest guaranteed compensation of any player currently in the NFL. This notion he’s passing on money commensurate with his value is absurd. He was willing to sign a long term deal as long as he got the bulk of the money early. He and his agent came to the negotiating table with a lot of sharp pencils.Yes. Mahomes did take less, but in a different way. He signed a long term contract so the team could work w/ it, and his contract doesn't add in the upcoming increases in the salary cap.
Insisting on short term huge contracts screws the team.
name the barbies?So do the Barbies not play in the NFL? Seems to me they get 17 chances a year to prove they are better. You can spew your ABD agenda till the cows come home and it will carry the same weight as your proclamation that the Cowboys offense would be better with Andy Dalton after Dak got hurt and that the Cowboys would not sign him after the franchise tag year or my all time favorite, "rumors are Dak's leg is not healing and he may never play again.." Those being your greatest hits. You will probably never top those.. but feel free to keep trying.
I dont think you have the facts to back that up lol.Good for the Chiefs. But Mahomes‘ cash flow is stronger than any other player in the league over the next four years, and he has the third highest guaranteed compensation of any player currently in the NFL. This notion he’s passing on money commensurate with his value is absurd. He was willing to sign a long term deal as long as he got the bulk of the money early. He and his agent came to the negotiating table with a lot of sharp pencils.
that was funny lolHey, Prescott carried the team in the last 3 playoff losses