G2
Taco Engineer
- Messages
- 25,182
- Reaction score
- 26,730
Not true at all. Your hatred is making you awfully silly.He sucked before the Atlanta game.
Not true at all. Your hatred is making you awfully silly.He sucked before the Atlanta game.
Nonsense. Cowboys scored 19, 17, 28, 30, 31, 40, 33 and 28 pts before that game, an average of 28 a game. 16 tds, only 4 ints. 4 ratings of 105 or better. Average completion rate of over 63%. One fumble, which was recovered by Dallas. 5-3 record.
He did not suck before the Atlanta game...
He didn't "suck" before that game but the tendencies were still there. Now they are just magnified to the 10th degree. I tink Linehan needs to dumb down the playbook again like in 2016, because Dak is simply not developing the way quality NFL QBs have developed by year 3.Not true at all. Your hatred is making you awfully silly.
Who played great on offense?He didn't "suck" before that game but the tendencies were still there. Now they are just magnified to the 10th degree. I tink Linehan needs to dumb down the playbook again like in 2016, because Dak is simply not developing the way quality NFL QBs have developed by year 3.
Any quarterback can hit a high percentage with low interceptions if they dink and dunk.
And college is nothing. Kellen Moore has unbelievable college stats. Winningest quarterback in college history.
The Cowboys offense in 6 of the last 9 games have scored 12 points or less....if that's not alarming for an offense then I don't know what is!
The heck I can't. I knew what hid weaknesses were, I was just hoping they could improve him. When u are running wishbone crap for ur qb, that means he's not an nfl qb.IF he isn't, you can't really blame the FO for believing he was after his first season fireworks.
Now this is true. We can all go back to threads were people pointed out Dak issues (even when he was winning).Yes you can blame the front office. There was a better player on the roster at the position his rookie season. Plenty of forum members here noticed Dak’s accuracy issues and poor footwork back then and were written off as Romo fan boys.
It starts with the signal caller. If they take away the run and your QB can't beat man to man coverage, your offense is going to be bad. Yeah, WRs weren't always getting open and OL not always blocking well, but most of the time that wasn't true. There were a lot of plays to be made and Dak didn't make them. Whether incomplete or passes due to poor throws or makable passes that for some reason were never attempted, Dak looked like garbage in the first half and only barely average in the second. he simply needs to play better. Hopefully, he'll show out against the Giants, but I'm not too optimisitic.Who played great on offense?
I was one of the people expressing concerns.Now this is true. We can all go back to threads were people pointed out Dak issues (even when he was winning).
I'm not excluding Prescott, he sucked. So who else was great?It starts with the signal caller. If they take away the run and your QB can't beat man to man coverage, your offense is going to be bad. Yeah, WRs weren't always getting open and OL not always blocking well, but most of the time that wasn't true. There were a lot of plays to be made and Dak didn't make them. Whether incomplete or passes due t poor throws or makable passes that for some reason were never attempted, Dak looked like garbage in the first half and only barely average in the second. he simply needs to play better. Hopefully, he'll show out against the Giants, but I'm not too optimisitic.
i believe you! Also I understand why everyone is expressing their views on Dak more openly. Prior to this game, there was some backlash on any criticism of Dak.I was one of the people expressing concerns.
Yeah, the seocond level blocking wasn't there but that affect the running game mostly. This was one of those games where the other team told you, "beat us with the pass". Yes, they got good play from their Dline and great play from Kuechly, but you can't get the story of the game by rewatching it on normal TV. According to Broaddus and others who have watched the game live or on the "All 22", there were a bunch of plays that were blocked well enough, where Dak failed to identify open receivers. That is a problem that cannot be identified on a normal TV broadcast because you can't see the whole field on your screen.I'm not excluding Prescott, he sucked. So who else was great?
I went back and watched the game again because a lot of fans were saying that Prescott froze and didn't hit running lanes when the play broke down. What I say was a bunch of plays broke down and Kuechly hounding the LOS. That guy was unstoppable. If we have Fred that wouldn't happen, he is great at second level blocking. Many pieces failed.
How many current great quarterbacks in the NFL came from the SEC?All I'm saying is that if he just can't do it, that should have showed up at least a bit in college, and it didn't. And Moore didn't play SEC teams but seldom, he was a lower echelon team's quarterback, Dak played big time teams...
Absolutely. And believe it or not nobody roots as hard for Dak as I do. That is why I'm so frustrated and worried and have needed to vent.i believe you! Also I understand why everyone is expressing their views on Dak more openly. Prior to this game, there was some backlash on any criticism of Dak.
While i remain somewhere in the middle and hopefully ( although my brain tells me not be silly), I can understand why people feel vindicated and are venting now.
At the end of the day, we are all still Cowboys fans!
Parcells is a Hall of Fame HC. Jason Garrett is only the HC of a NFL team because of Jerry Jones.Before he was a starter Parcells used to stand behind Romo in practice with a stopwatch and bark if he didn't get the ball out soon enough.