- Messages
- 110,756
- Reaction score
- 139,219
Plays great against division but has a .500 record outside of division.

Plays great against division but has a .500 record outside of division.

We have to stop throwing around the idea of could any QB of won a SB with this defense. It’s not a one season sample with Dak! It’s watching him for 10 years. Plays great against division but has a .500 record outside of division. Forget about 500 yards and 7 TDS against the Giants and Commanders in past years that is stat padding very misleading numbers.
Well I just don't think we want to blow up the good part of this team for a guessing game next season. I agree we need a better T as well. I have not run the numbers myself but I have heard it is doable. If not, then I guess we are 2nd tier until Jerry and co. Figure out how to run the numbers and the talent like other successful teams.Agreed, but the part that isnt so simple is you're now committing significantly more resources to keep that offense the same as you'll commit close to $40m extra per year just to keep Williams/Pickens. You also have a QB whose cap hit jumps an extra $24M, although a restructure is likely to bring that back down to a similar point to 2025. The other issue that gets glossed over at times is the offense kinda ran out of steam as the year went on....still some very good performances dont get me wrong, but they ended the season averaging 22ppg their last 4 games, and really played up and down ever since the Denver game. I think its fair to ask if this offense is truly elite level or just a really good unit that looked elite based on some early season dominance as teams tried to figure out the Cowboys with a new weapon to play with in George Pickens.
If we are going to go the run it back with the offense and throw whatever you can on the defensive side of the football to make that unit top 20ish instead of dead last could be a dangerous game as well as we may need to anticipate some natural regression from the offense if they don't look to upgrade anywhere, especially at the tackle spot.
As is Dak.Darnold is a bus driver
In the playoffs?If you ignore EVERY statistic, sure. Dumb thread
Stephen A Smith saying what we have all been saying.
Dak doesn’t think he is though.As is Dak.
Or any of 500 coaches Jerry?Seattle could win with any quarterback in the league
The problem with Dak, and we've seen it over and over in big games, is that he melts under pressure. Its a team sport, but we just witnessed a composed efficient QB lead his team through the best teams in the NFL. So, Darnold proved his metal. Dak hasn't and thats the whole point.The Seahawks didn't overcome 14 penalties...because Sam Darnold had his offense together. Unless you want to say Dak is uniquely unqualified to lead men. You seem to imagine Dak the victim of some cosmic scheme...and anyone who doesn't provide Dak the same excuses you don't make for other QBs...they are in on the scheme and "lying".
I did not "lie"...and your issues are with the facts. So much so, that you feel as though exposing me as a liar is the same as proving your point. You haven't and it ain't.
The GOALPOSTS are moved because you find an excuse for WHY DAK'S PERFORMANCE SUCKED. His offensive unit sucked WHICH HE LEADS. Funny how "we" got 14 penalties but the wins belong to Dak. NO, Dak owns the penalties just like he owns the wins. He must overcome them and/or command the respect of his unit to prevent it. It starts in practice.
But guess what? IF THE QB SUCKS AND GOES DEER-IN-HEADLIGHTS, he can't rally the troops, stop the bleeding or compete LIKE SAM DARNOLD DID WHEN HIS DEFENSE HAD ISSUES WITH A GREAT OFFENSE.
$60mm/year....bought us nothing but misery and cheerleading fans who apologize for Dak.
Seattle built a solid balanced team Dak never has had that. Maybe there were a few years we were closeWell, Sam Darnold led the Seattle Seahawks to their franchise 5th NFC Conference finals. Will be his first, which makes him a better QB than Dak Prescott.
Sure, all the stats will be thrown out saying Prescott is but stats are for players contracts.
Fans --which Dallas fans are starving for-- ONLY care about ONE thing....WINS.
Then Dallas fans will say Prescott has more wins that Darnold then I say, the ONLY stats fellow starving Cowboys
care about is (FIRST) getting to a NFC Conference finals, which Prescott, nor Romo, has ever accomplished.
Then Dallas fans could/might say, Seattle has a better team around Darnold.
Then again, I say it is about WINS and if the Seahawks have a better team, which now Demarcus Lawrence plays
for and a ProBowler, then that blame directly on the grocery shopper. He buys the groceries and hired the coaches.
Like Demarcus Ware, Mr. Lawrence and future ( or current) Dallas players must get out of Dallas if they want to even play in a NFC Conference game because Jerry's Pride will never allow this franchise to see another conference finals.
It is a business first and the players knows
So I hope Mr. Lawrence gets a chance to play in a Supwerbowl, maybe win it and down the line, sign his one day contract as a Dallas Cowboy as Mr. Ware did.
As is Dak.
Dak doesn’t think he is though.
If Dak would just accept his place, like Darnold has, the Cowboys would be so much more successful.
Dak likes his stats though.
Dak passed for 206 yards and a TD against San Fran when our D only gave up 19 points.Darnold hasn’t thrown for over 200 yards in 3 games. It Dak could pass for 124 yards and win I’m sure he too would be in a conference championship……
He’s not. If he was he’d be payed more. There’s not an nfl GM who wouldn’t take darnold career over daksCompletely disagree. Darnold is far more talented. Dak has much more experience and risk averse.
Yes Darnold does have some "moments" & I certainly can't say for sure if he'll ever have championship mental side and poise. But if he does, he'll be dangerous.
Facts and outcomes aren't ridiculous - worthy of ridicule. What's worthy of ridicule are BS hypotheticals and apologetics meant to prop up a PROVEN LOSER AND CHOKER.This is a ridiculos argument.
Sam Darnold would have been absolutely destroyed by this forum.
All of the posters who hate Dak would hate Darnold even more.
Dude led the entire league in turnovers.
Had a much, much better team around him.
I’ve realized Dak has not succeeded in the playoffs and I didn’t not support his last extension, but Darnold never even took a team to the playoff until he got on a loaded team on both sides of the ball.
The hypocrisy around here is just sometimes too much to bear.
Even with the SB win and 2 14 win seasons back-to-back on different squads? I guess that's easy to do...and failing epically like Dak is hard.He’s not. If he was he’d be payed more. There’s not an nfl GM who wouldn’t take darnold career over daks
