jnday
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,292
- Reaction score
- 11,422
Goodell thinks he is Godell.
At one time, I would have disagreed, but now I see that he is a power- hungry little bully that likes to throw his authority around.
Goodell thinks he is Godell.
Did you happen to see this post?
http://cowboyszone.com/threads/counter-point-sturm-is-wrong-about-our-drafting.348875
I looked back at the article and it was Sturm. I edited my response.Oh, apologies. I thought you were referencing that Sturm article.
At one time, I would have disagreed, but now I see that he is a power- hungry little bully that likes to throw his authority around.
I read the points and they are weak. The only one that has any real merit is the one year we had no first round pick. But at the end of the day there WERE other teams in those years with no first round picks. And if you trade away your first round picks, then that is your own fault. Adding ONE more starter to the list would not have changed much.
Gotta love the point where he insinuates that having Garrett as our coach hurt our player development. I will agree on that one big time. LOL
The others don't water in my opinion. And why would sturm sabotage something like that?
Oh well? LOL
And they went ahead and did the same sort of stupid thing this year even after the Gregory debacle. Only this time it is an injury issue. And the guy wont even play this year. Mind boggling how stupid the Cowboy brass is. They always have to hit the home run. Always have to go for the big score, the risky pick. They cant simply do the steady, smart thing. The best drafting teams do just that. When the Cowboys have drafted steady and smart their drafts have been much better. I can show you an article on just how bad the Cowboys have been drafting over the last 9 years if you are interested compared to the rest of the league.
For some reason the team considers the second round as the rounnd to gamble. The second round is a round to get starters IMO. Why gamble when starting quality players are available that offers little risk? Gambles should be taken in the mid-rounds at the earliest. It is a poor approach to the draft and the results over the last ten years prove just how bad the second round has been for the team.
You don't think there is any merit to starting from when Garrett and the new regime came here? It makes perfect sense to me. The current FO should not be judged by the picks of the Phillips era.
For some reason the team considers the second round as the rounnd to gamble. The second round is a round to get starters IMO. Why gamble when starting quality players are available that offers little risk? Gambles should be taken in the mid-rounds at the earliest. It is a poor approach to the draft and the results over the last ten years prove just how bad the second round has been for the team.
Its Jerry and Stephen that have been drafting so at what point does it matter. Now if you are trying to prove that in the last 5 years drafting has improved, then you could bias the stats to show only those years. But even if you did, I dont think that it would change all that much. The first round has been great of late, but certainly from the 3rd round on, its been horrific. Even our second rounders have been suspect in that time.
14 players drafted by the Cowboys in rounds 4-7 from 2011 to 2015 played in the NFL during the 2015 season.
This includes 4 4th round picks, 4 7th round picks, 4 5th round picks and 2 6th round picks.
Compare that to 11 for the Eagles, 8 for the Giants, and 15 for the Commanders. The number lies somewhere in the middle of the pack.
Of course, this doesnt account for the undrafted free agents that have made a profound impact including a Pro Bowl kicker.
Jury is out on Smith and Gregory, but all other 2nd RD picks have been / are starters--success to a varying degree, but that's the draft.
Smith, Gregory, D-Law, Escobar, Crawford, Carter, Lee
From that same thread:
From that same thread:
You don't think there is any merit to starting from when Garrett and the new regime came here? It makes perfect sense to me. The current FO should not be judged by the picks of the Phillips era.
For some reason the team considers the second round as the rounnd to gamble. The second round is a round to get starters IMO. Why gamble when starting quality players are available that offers little risk? Gambles should be taken in the mid-rounds at the earliest. It is a poor approach to the draft and the results over the last ten years prove just how bad the second round has been for the team.
Well the argument is they help you train and add power.
Smith isnt playing, Gregory is pretty much toast, escobar has been a total bust, Crawford has been solid but ovepaid, Carter was a joke and didnt get resigned. Lee has been great, but he plays just about every other year.
Lawrence actually will probably wind up being the best 2nd round pick in a long time if he doesnt get suspended again. Then maybe Crawford as a 3rd rounder, and then Lee with his games missed. all the rest have been disappointments thus far.
But we dont need stats to know that the Cowboys drafts under McClay have been better than pre McClay. That is without question. But still...............Jerry sneaks in too much with his style of drafting and rounds 2-7 are still not good enough. Would you agree on that?
I will admit I haven't been estaic with some of the picks of late. But, I do not believe we are one of the worst drafting teams in the NFL.
Amphetamines, including those prescribed for ADD/ADHD, do not have any sustained performance-enhancing benefit.
When properly prescribed, the level of adrenalin-like substances in the patient is no different from their untreated levels.
Problems arise when individuals elect to take 2-4 times the usual dosage, and then are in effect "speeding". This gives a temporary boost of energy similar to adrenaline, and it can be sustained for several hours before the body crashes. One could conceive that speeding during a game would give a player a temporary advantage, so this is properly banned. However, the long term effects of amphetamine use are highly detrimental and actually confer a disadvantage to that kind of user.