Yakuza Rich
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 18,043
- Reaction score
- 12,385
The addiction problems didn't bother the 1990's Cowboys much
How many of them were free agents or trades that we picked up the problem?
Seriously, I don't recall any. It's a different scenario when a player you drafted or signed as a UDFA turns into a good player and develops a drug problem versus picking up a player that already has a drug problem.
I think Clayton doesn't know what he is talking about. Cleveland would be lucky to get a trade worth ANY value for Manziel. I don't hate the kid and I think he has some potential, but his potential is FAR FAR below what even his most ardent supporters thought it could be judging by his play out there.
For instance, I thought he played well in the Cincy game a couple of months ago, but his supporting cast stunk. Even still, there's a lot of deficiencies in his game. He struggles to throw out of the pocket because of his lack of height and he's just not very fast to beat defenses with his legs.
Combine that with his off-the-field issues and the Browns are lucky to get anything more than a 6th round pick for the guy.
With that being said, I'm not completely buying into Clayton's statements. It appears that Jimmy Haslam wanted Manziel there while Ray Farmer and Mike Pettine didn't. Farmer and Pettine are reportedly gone after today and I don't know if Haslam is all too happy with how Manziel has been handled by those two. Like it or not, Manziel volunteered to go to rehab and him drinking is not against the law nor is it really anybody's business unless he's showing up for work drunk or breaking the law with his drinking. I actually think a lot of this ties into if Manziel has failed a league mandated drug test (first offense) and a second violation would lead to a 4-game suspension. If he hasn't failed a test yet, perhaps Haslam is going to give him another chance next season.
YR