JPTEXAS;2211119 said:
I guess NFL.com stats are wrong. Thats what they say..so take a look.
Again, you're wrong.
Here's the NFL.com stats
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categoryst...sonType=REG&tabSeq=2&qualified=true&Submit=Go
Check out Dallas on line 13.
It's more like Dallas SCORED 28 points a game, not allowed 28 points a game.
And Pro-Football-Reference.com backs this up as well
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/dal/2007.htm
So do you still want to back up Zimmer, even though you've been wrong on the amount of points the team allowed under Wade last year (way off in fact) and off on the last time the team played the 4-3 under Zimmer?
You don't think that the addition of WARE and other players would make more sacks than what Zimmer had to work with? If Zimmer had the talent that is on this defense now we would be great. Yes the defense folded..why Because we didn't have a offense and they were on the field most of the game.
1. Zimmer had Ware in 2005 & 2006 and Dallas recorded 38 and 34 sacks in those seasons. One year under Wade and Dallas recorded 46 sacks, the most by a Dallas team since 1994.
2. Here's a look at Dallas' time of possession rankings from 2003-2006 under Zimmer:
2003 - 2nd
2004 - 12th
2005 - 2nd
2006 - 10th
The offenses may not have been explosive, but they sure kept the ball for quite some time. Yet the defense folded each of those years in the second half of the season.
Whether or not they had Ware, Zimmer should've been able to do something with the defense in the time he was given, the first round draft picks and free agents he was given.
Instead, he remained steadfast at stopping the run at all costs and it showed (and hurt the team in the end). He then went to Atlanta to play his coveted 4-3/Cover 2 scheme and they had an anemic sack rate with one of the best pass rushers in the league in Jon Abraham and he got another first round pick (7th overall) in Jammal Anderson, a DE who played every game last season and had a whopping ZERO sacks last year.
YAKUZA