Tommy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,217
- Reaction score
- 2,977
He would be another Donovan McNabb. Not a Patrick Mahommes.In other words, would he be a better player or better production under Shanahan or Andy Reid........
He would be another Donovan McNabb. Not a Patrick Mahommes.In other words, would he be a better player or better production under Shanahan or Andy Reid........
Played a bad game? LOL, He had the worst season of his career, and visible, which is going downhill, Dak is inconsistent, I don't know him, but when someone is committed to his team, or to the sport, he plays asking for what he's worth, not abusing an opportunity so that they pay him more without having shown anything, such is the case of Brady, he has never charged what Dak charges, but he is the best, and that's where good players are shown, without shame, he would do the same thing he is wanting to do Zeke, negotiate a salary cut and earn what it's really worth, people like you are more of an enemy of the team, since you defend an incompetent, and there is no fool who doesn't want to see reality,Dak is who he is, the rest of this stuff is just you making things up... Dak played a bad game, you trying to make it personal is just dumb. If you know this man personally and can prove he "Only cares about his wallet" then post up or just stop. He cared about the team in Tampa, so only in SF did he start caring about his wallet? how dumb
Honestly .....I'll take that in a heartbeat (lol).He would be another Donovan McNabb. Not a Patrick Mahommes.
Yes yes "Enemy of the team" continue your personal Dak quest, he also eats babies and such. I dont defend anyone i do call out dumb posts that claim ridiculous claims because your angry like a 5 year old with a voice. Matter of fact if you can find a post of me defending Dak's play then show it my history is open, Dak played horrible, attack his play, what wierd feeling do you get calling another man names and personal attcks on character that you've never met?Played a bad game? LOL, He had the worst season of his career, and visible, which is going downhill, Dak is inconsistent, I don't know him, but when someone is committed to his team, or to the sport, he plays asking for what he's worth, not abusing an opportunity so that they pay him more without having shown anything, such is the case of Brady, he has never charged what Dak charges, but he is the best, and that's where good players are shown, without shame, he would do the same thing he is wanting to do Zeke, negotiate a salary cut and earn what it's really worth, people like you are more of an enemy of the team, since you defend an incompetent, and there is no fool who doesn't want to see reality,
I agree 100% that a new scheme is needed. The problem is that the scheme needs to be tailored around what Dak can do well. This is the 2016 offense. Less reading defense. Simplify things. Focus on movement and highlight his running. You say that it is a killer when every route is a comeback route but what if that is the only throw your QB is comfortable making?A different scheme would help. Moore don’t scheme players open every game and Dak can stare down receivers. But when 3/4 of your pass game is come back routes it’s a killer.
I agree he had an awful game but the question is how do we live with him going forward? We have to try something different on offense b/c the current OC scheme/Qb combo can't get through the SF defense. They own us. So, the only option is changing the scheme bc we can't get rid of Dak. And even that might not make a difference but running back kellen and Dak for round 3 against SF in the playoffs next year sounds like a losing proposition.Agreed. His confidence is damaged, and his psyche is currently shot. When he's up against a strong opposing DC, he melts under pressure. You cannot blame the Oline or receivers or even KM as he was given a good game plan and our defense certainly showed up in this game as well. The game was his to win on several occasions and he just could not make the throws. All that said. He needs a very good QB coach or OC (a QB whisperer) who can wipe his memory clean and work on his mental and physical capabilities. Tons of film work and foot work and he needs to throw tons of balls at moving targets in the offseason. If that doesn't work, he needs to pick up a fishing pole and retire.
I think Dak can do it, I'm just giving 2 more years. Lets see if our front office does anything to support him. They don't. It's not really going to matter what QB we trot in if they're going to take the same approach to every off season.I agree with this BUT before we do, let's see if another OC and/or system can help. Let's not forget, he's proven he can get you a winning season AND to the early rounds of the postseason. So we are looking for a QB that can guarantee us an NFCCG or more?
Tony Dungy and Bucs had a very similar situation........he was fired, not for winning or making playoffs but for NOT advancing far enough.
Dak wins when they run the ball effectively.Does anyone else think. different and better coaching could help Dak
To me you have 2 years, if KM can change then fine, but Dak has to be in an RPO/PA offense. Pistol, under center using Pollard/Davis (or drafted RB) Lamb, Turpin, get another WR capable of being a line of scrimmage threat...Make the defense defend the LOS and pass off of it. Unless Dak is willing to give some money back, this is really the only option i see to make anything happen with this defense that looks ready to win now.I agree 100% that a new scheme is needed. The problem is that the scheme needs to be tailored around what Dak can do well. This is the 2016 offense. Less reading defense. Simplify things. Focus on movement and highlight his running. You say that it is a killer when every route is a comeback route but what if that is the only throw your QB is comfortable making?
One of the beat writers had an interesting take......as he pointed out when Pollard went down, that left Dak with ONE playmaker in CeeDee and 49er knew it. So they did everything they could to take him away. We are not that far off......2 more wins, we are playing in the Super Bowl.I think Dak can do it, I'm just giving 2 more years. Lets see if our front office does anything to support him. They don't. It's not really going to matter what QB we trot in if they're going to take the same approach to every off season.
Thats the thinking that scares me though, last year we had all the playmakers and laid the same dud at home. This structure works in the regular season, i think we have proved it does not work when it gets down to the 6 best teams and 1 game for all the marbles.One of the beat writers had an interesting take......as he pointed out when Pollard went down, that left Dak with ONE playmaker in CeeDee and 49er knew it. So they did everything they could to take him away. We are not that far off......2 more wins, we are playing in the Super Bowl.
Not just Dak, they used Lamb some but you need to put Pollard Turpin Lamb and 1 more playmaker who is capable of LOS plays in and make the defense defend the LOS... then pass off of it, this plays into Dak's strengths and also this defenses strength. The next 2 years have got to be about how to help this defense win games that matter they are the strength.Not at this point. He is what he is. You just have to use him the right way. In the playoffs when games count, he has to run. Only way you will get enough out of him. He is a slow learner and doesn’t adapt well. Reason why he succeeds against teams he plays often and struggles with teams he doesn’t play often.