bbgun;2835822 said:
http://img199.*************/img199/3669/ch21thunov272008061750p.jpg
"Demarcus Ware? No, mon. I no see him lately."
LOL! Love it.
Terence Newman700;2835889 said:
yea I'm trying to figure out, who put the gun to your head, and said "read"
if you don't like it, don't read, much less reply, duh
LOL. Sorry Slate but that response did crack me up.
bbgun;2835925 said:
http://img20.*************/img20/1124/ch21sundec72008060355pm.jpg
Invisible fail.
By far the best post of this entire thread.
Four;2836127 said:
whatever, it's negative cause you take it that way, or it was him being confident he could have made the play.
there are two ways to take it and you don't like greg so you took it the negative way.
I just see a guy who wanted to win and felt he could have made a play there, so friggin what?
I don't get the angle you guys took with it, but whatever, I don't get most of the negativity on the board these days.
you guys whine way more than greg ever did, fyi.
I don't hate Greg, at all, and have enjoyed watching him play while he was here. I wished he'd have not whined as much in the offseason, so that wouldn't be what everyone tends to focus on, but I like him.
And even with liking him, and thinking he did well for us, that was him bashing and puffing himself up. It's actually pretty obvious.
Four;2836189 said:
because if it happened one time then what greg said was true.
if one time ware came off and said the things ellis said then it's true.
it had to happen one time.
not more than that.
you guys read more into his statement than I do.
it's a bias thing, plain and simple.
And you're not bias to the other side? It's quite obvious you're such a huge fan of Greg that he could say "I'm not being rude here but I think your mother is a Cow." and you'd defend it as Greg just being honest.
Bias goes both ways bro and you're quite clearly bias to the other side.
Four;2836196 said:
I didn't do anything stupid, you don't agree with how I take the interview.
then I get called a liar and stupid because my opinion is different than the popular one.
you guys are way the hell out of line coming at me like you are, just because you don't agree with how I take the interview.
and guess what, from my perspective you are being stupid. (and biased)
ohhh I just lied again, better call the internet forum police because I disagree with you guys. ohhh I R stupidz.
lmao @ you guys.
Ok...so let me get this straight. You having one opinion means you're not biased, and clear thinking, but anyone having the opposite opinion is biased and there for being stupid?
Ok...I guess. Apparently you're another one of those folks whose opinion is the right one, and based in enlightened facts, and everyone else is dumb for having a differing opinion. But, dear God, they better not question you right?
Please.
Four;2836238 said:
well actually he prefaced what he said with he is not bashing, and during and after.
that way you put it sounds worse to me, and I take that as bias.
twisting the facts to suit your point. That's how I see that post of yours you quoted.
Dude that doesn't help your case. If you have to preference a statement by saying "i'm not bashing" before you say it then you're doing so because you KNOW YOUR BASHING.
If he didn't feel like he was going to say something that was bashing him he'd have had no need to add that little disclaimer.
That's pretty simple.
Four;2836263 said:
what does that mean? that greg should be able to keep up with a WR?
I don't know the play you are referring to off hand, but we all know greg looked awkward at best in coverage.
He wasn't asked to cover Toomer. He was talking about the fact that he simply had a shot to tackle him and made one of the worst efforts, ever, at doing so. It had nothing to do with covering him, he wasn't asked to do that, just to make a pretty routine tackle. He failed at it.
So if he's going to bash Spencer for missing a routine tackle, and then say 'but I'd have made that tackle', then it's probably best to not have any evidence out there that would prove otherwise.
Four;2836267 said:
good lord, you can't handle people having a differing view than you to the point I have to be in denial?
and I am a queen now, lovely how you guys resort to name calling and innuendo.
good show.
You're just as bad. You've name called as well. Trying to defend name calling, because people called you names, is still name calling. So stop whinning about others doing it to you if you're not above doing it right back.
Four;2836314 said:
greg sucked in coverage, that play has nothing to do with the entire premise of the arguement.
twist twist twist, you guys really don't think you are biased?
that's just silliness.
And, once again, he wasn't covering him. He was simply there to attempt to make a tackle and he failed at it.
Bias, bias, bias on your part because you're just going to make up excuses and reasons why it's ok that Greg missed an easy, routine, tackle but it's perfectly ok for him to bash another teammate for missing one and then saying, 'i'd have made that tackle.'
Four;2836337 said:
it's not the same at all, spencer got his hands on the guy whiffed on the tackle, in run support.
Greg said he would have made the tackle.
so, a pass play has nothing to do with run support.
you, like many others, are very biased.
A tackle is a tackle. It doesn't matter if it's at the line of scrimmage, behind it, or 6 yards beyond the line of scrimmage. Tackles are tackles. You don't get to decide which tackles that are missed count as tackles and which ones dont.
Four;2836340 said:
no it isn't, one is I have a chip on my shoulder(which you do and have proven)
and another is comfortable in their own skin.
don't call me a loser, I don't call you names, and you don't know me.
but I don't like guys like you, and no you wouldn't knock my teeth in, I can promise you that, tough guy.
And you don't know him yet you've already judged him as if you do. You don't know if he has a chip on his shoulder, based on message board words, anymore than people who think you're a whinner, and bias, personally know you.
And how do you know he wouldn't knock your teeth out? Again, just like he doesn't know you, you don't know him.
Works both ways, again, and yet you seem to think people should treat you in a different manner than you treat others.
SLATEmosphere;2836343 said:
A tackle is a tackle. Sorry.
They don't keep track of "passing tackles" and "run support tackles"
Exactly.
Four;2836350 said:
I know you enough, you have a chip on your shoulder.
you get butt hurt when people disagree with you and you pitch a little fit.
you said I am a loser because I don't punch people in the face if they call me fat. You know what you were implying. You do that crap to more people than me here.
you throw a ton of BS out and when you get called on it you act like a spoiled little kid.
trust me that i am not the only one here who sees it that way.
I won't be responding to you again, it does no good to ever explain anything to you.
You know him enough to throw around labels, and make judgements on him, based on his posts but no one knows you enough to do the same to you based on your posts?
Wow.