I'm good on the definitional meaning of the word...so instead of making a generalization about my initial post, why don't you actual provide a substantive POV, counselor, on why you think the Brady case will or won't be a bread crumb trail for how we can expect Zeke's appeal to play out...I welcome a respectful debate and not some smart aleck request for me to go do homework...indulge me please.
lol
Riiiiiiight...so the previous ruling of the appellate court judge (in the Brady case) will have absolutely zero basis in a judge's ruling in Zeke's case...because, according to you, every case is considered independently from all other cases. The fact is the CBA agreement WILL BE factored into the outcome of Zeke's case whether we want it to or not. Why the heck do you think lawyers spend so much time learning and citing case law?!! The whole judicial system is predicated on legal precedents!?!
I mean I don't even know if I should be taking u seriously rt now. Is this sarcasm that I'm missing?
look, man, the cases are not carbon copies. There are different facts, and therefore different potential claims in court. Previous court cases are used as persuasive sources and are not 100% fool proof dispositive as so many people online seem to think that they are.
Brady: deflated footballs, lack of notice argument, etc.
Zeke: DV allegations, witness credibility, possible extortion, etc.
The facts are different. The case will be litigated almost entirely different from the Brady case should it go to trial before a judge. Counsel from both sides will likely cite the Brady case to find parts to explain why this one should be decided the same or why it's entirely different and how the judge got it wrong last time, etc. That's how the system works...it's not a math equation where "well Brady lost so Zeke can't even sue".