It doesn't explain why those young QB's aren't sitting atop all of those lists. No, they're not. Here are the actual, unfudged, numbers: https://www.pro-football-reference....toyear_3=2018&player_id3=PresDa01&idx=players Sorry, the guy you're attempting to minimize has only been in the league 3 years. Anyone else seeing this? The blatant hypocrisy being clearly shown here? Someone who says that "using a 3 year sample size is foolhardy" and then trying to use a 1 year (2018) "sample size"? You're just making things look worse and worse for you. You should just let it go and quit while you're behind.