northerncowboynation
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,925
- Reaction score
- 6,303
good question
Pass the popcorn Dave
good question
Great pointBoth play on ST's. We lost Wilber and Smith, replaced one with Olawale
Thanks for the update.Updating the Cowboys’ draft picks after the trade for Jamize Olawale: No. 19 (first round), No. 50 (second round), No. 81 (third round), No. 116 (fourth round), No. 137 (fourth round), No. 171 (fifth round), No. 192 (sixth round), No. 193 (sixth round), No. 208 (sixth round), No. 236 (seventh round).
Todd Archer, ESPN Staff Writer
I feel better alreadyI sincerely hope this is therapeutic for some of you... Wow!
So we're going to argue 6 receptions over 5 receptions? And 26 yards over 33 yards and then claim that "Olawale is an all around fullback"?
If that's the case, why did he actually play far fewer snaps than Smith did on both offense and special teams?
And why did Smith take his job in Oakland?
People are bored, so anything will get the board's attention a little bit.
Trading down 20 slots very late the draft to get a FB is pretty inconsequential. I agree.
Raiders signed him for 3 mil more than what Olawale is getting.
20 spots on day three is nothing. We use FBs more than most. This guy offers more as a receiver, probable isnt the impact blocker that Smith.
Were pinching pennies to fit in Martin and Lawrence contracts. Dak contract is looming.
This is a solid trade. The Zone can be ridiculous.
PINKRome wasn’t built in one day. The process in Dallas takes time. Olawale is just another brick in the wall.
Have to think that 5th would have helped in trading up during the draft a whole lot more than that 6th will.
PINK
Name a team more active than us this week. You can't.
This guy was going to be cut, why would they trade for him?