perfect illustration of the arbitrary nature of ref rules
the fitz catch didnt have enough conclusive evidence to over rule field call but the dez catch/no catch did. SURE THING BAWS!
thats why they spent a summer trying to figure it out right? because it was so conclusive that you could overturn the call on the field and they had to do damage control. pathetic.
these rules can be backed either way with language and rhetoric. thats the fail safe. rhetoric.
I've come to the conclusion....the league just makes up the rules from week to week to suite whatever out come they want. League is fixed. What has become hilarious is the announcers trying to explain the obvious buffoonery to make the league seem legit. It's such a farcy anymore....It's sickening.
I've come to the conclusion....the league just makes up the rules from week to week to suite whatever out come they want. League is fixed. What has become hilarious is the announcers trying to explain the obvious buffoonery to make the league seem legit. It's such a farcy anymore....It's sickening.
So many people, including myself, were talking during the week leading up to that game was that we were nervous of the officiating. Especially after what happened in the Detroit game. That we would not get the benefit of the doubt at all. And any close call, would not go our way. To kind of make up for what happened to Detroit. The whole week was not how we came back and won, but how much Detroit was "screwed" out of the loss. The entire week. And they made it worse by coming out and saying they got that call wrong. Like that mattered.