iceberg;1496512 said:
i bought an akita puppy and after 2-3 months and almost $1k in total expenses - i reaslized i'm *not* a dog owner and worse yet, the dog would pay the ultimate price for it in the end.
so i asked a friend of mine who had kids and other animals around (good for an akita) to take him - free. all i wanted was a good home for him. he's out in the country now on like 40 acres and loves it to death and every time i think about it i know i made the right move.
I had a couple dogs that were retired from my breeding program....while it hurt like hell to let them go to a good home...it hurt even more seeing what amounted (to me at least) a life sentence where the majority of their life would be in a 4x12 kennel run.
I see them now and then, and the owners occasionally drop me a line and some pics. Like you, I know it was the right move to make.
The most profound thing I've ever heard from a dog owner....Last year a guy called about a puppy, as they had just lost their Jack to cancer. It turned out to be a littermate of my first Jack...so we had a good long conversation.
I asked if when they found she had cancer, if they tried chemo or anything...and he said, without missing a beat.."I loved her too much for that."
He and his wife bought 2 pups from us..and we've become good friends. The best thing about how I approach the breeding of dogs, is the network of people I've brought togther, across the country, in some form or another. This, to me, is an example of how dog breeding can influence a community for the good.
Of course, there is always an opposite of good. There is alot of breeding for all the wrong reasons. One poster believes there is no effect on society for what one does with their dogs. The debate died, but I did do extensive research that until now, I haven't shared.
The dogs aren't the only ones who suffer. It's impossible to estimate how many other animals and humans have been harmed by violent people who are desensitized to brutality, in part as a result of watching or participating in dogfighting and other forms of animal cruelty. "Violence begets violence," Maloney explains. "Research proves that
people who abuse animals are more likely to abuse people. In addition, fighting enthusiasts often bring young children to the fights, desensitizing them to violence and teaching them that violence is accepted by society."
Animals in communities where dogfighting exists are also in danger for another reason—birds, rabbits, cats, small dogs and other animals are often captured or stolen and typically killed during training sessions where they are used as bait for fighting dogs.
In addition, dogfighting is connected to other forms of crime, including money laundering and drug trafficking. "Crime doesn't happen in a vacuum," says Goodwin. "When you have violent people betting large sums of money, you're going to have problems. Dogfighting is heavily linked to gambling, drugs, prostitution, gangs, and guns
http://www.hsus.org/pets/issues_aff...e_bloodthirsty_underworld_of_dogfighting.html
I could provide a lot more, but the above pretty much sums up most of what I've found, and should debunk the notion that dog fighting has no direct effect on society.
Until now, laws and enforcement have been too lenient. Hopefully, the bi- partisan bill HR 137, which passed in May, and I believe was signed into law by W., will curtail alot of problem....a person could be sentenced up to 3 years in prison.
Well, that's about enough...as Donald Fagan would say..."sue me if I play too long..."