I’m more surprised that Love could get paid that much with his limited sample of work. That’s crazy IMO. He could be a one year wonder.I'm surprised this thread hasn't been deleted because of The Athletic source but Russini is a solid writer/reporter.
And locker room leaderWell, there is that upside.
He outplays Prescott his agent will ask for more than Prescott gets.The Crystal Ball: (Just for Fun)
Trey Lance shows talent and promise in pre-season.
Dak begins season at 2-2 with subpar/average outings. An injury occurs somewhere between week 4 and
"49ers week" possibly season ending for Dak.
Lance lights a fire under entire team and shows leadership. (Beats SF!?! Maybe.)
Dallas finishes with a loss in the NFC Championship
but looks poised to return in 2025.
Dak signs a prove it contract with obscure team. Maybe Seattle.
Hey, this scenario would be a lot better for the team
(and the fans) than handing Mr. Thousand yard stare to a
65M APY contract.
I realize, even in this dream world scenario, Lance will require a new contract. I say he's rewarded with a nice contract that essentially would be less than half of Dak's price.
Sounds good to me bye DakSo 1 Dak Prescott
= 3 DeMarcus Lawrences
= 4 Zack Martins
= 5 Terrence Steeles
= 8 Donovan Wilsons
= 11 Micah Parsons
= 16 & 1/2 Tyler Smiths
= 58 DaRon Blands
Rather than keep Dak, just hook me up with a couple of Micah Parsons, a sixpack of Tyler Smiths, and a case of DaRon Blands.
Oh, and I'll take a Trey Lance to go.
I'm thinking it's closer to Baker Mayfield's contract.He outplays Prescott his agent will ask for more than Prescott gets.
I think if he hits FA he’ll get upwards to 63-65 from someone.If he leaves Dallas their is a good chance he will make over $60M.
There has been a history of teams doing this, and it typically works out. Not too often does a QB have a season like that with no bad seasons prior and then disappearI’m more surprised that Love could get paid that much with his limited sample of work. That’s crazy IMO. He could be a one year wonder.
This is exactly right. The salary’s are proportional to the % of the cap. The average fan doesn’t understand this or ignores it and continues to get sticker shock. The salary’s are going to continue to rise because the cap jumpsI agree and I don't think people should be surprised by that number either. The top AAV right now is $55M (24.47% of the cap at signing) and that was set by Burrow a year ago. If the cap jumps another 10% next year 24.47% would be $68M. As of this years cap number 24.47% would be $62M.
If Dak wants to be paid similar to Burrow $60M is actually a slight (very slight) discount. If Dak were willing to take $55M Jerry should have already signed the papers. If Jerry wouldn't sign Dak for $55M he should have already moved on from Dak because there is zero chance of retaining him.
I agree, but if I was a Packers fan I’d be a little nervous. But if I was a Packers fan I’d want the deal done because of his youth and potential. So we’ll see but you made a good point and I agree with you.There has been a history of teams doing this, and it typically works out. Not too often does a QB have a season like that with no bad seasons prior and then disappear
Dak is going to be a member of the garbage time hall of fame some day. Show some respect...Love killed Dak in the playoffs. Dak does not deserve this kind of money, he can't read a zone defense if they show man coverage.
Ever since the accusations in the "fake" twitter account....i haven't been able to follow her without thinking the worst and that's unfortunate.I'm surprised this thread hasn't been deleted because of The Athletic source but Russini is a solid writer/reporter.