Give him credit: Roy is a beast in the run game..

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
2much2soon;1803896 said:
cue the footage of Roy with textbook coverage on potential HOF'er Jimmy Smith against JAX his rookie year.
Do you really believe Roy has always played like he has the last 2 seasons?

Was this 1 play or something? How about you get the video.

Still not buying it.

RW was NEVER a coverage safety.

People fell in love with him for hitting EVERYTHING. Not deflecting passes.

He is what he is. A run stopping SS who intimidates receivers across the middle.
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
Rampage;1803912 said:
:rolleyes: whatever man, why did wade take the great roy williams off the field so much last night if he's so good?

No one is saying he is a great cover guy.

You think you made your old name "BigBadRoy" (or whatever) because he locked down receivers? Should have been "ShutDownRoy" then. :rolleyes:

You did it because he hits people... really hard.

If you expected him to cover people with a 100% success rate than you built him up way too much in that head of yours.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
AdamJT13;1803892 said:
Hamlin has a very good chance of making it this season, whether he deserves it or not.




Then it's utterly amazing that we're No. 1 in the NFL in interceptions, No. 6 in yards allowed per pass, No. 3 in completion percentage allowed and tied for No. 4 in passer rating allowed. Especially when our two best cornerbacks have been hampered by injuries all season (either one or both at a time).


Wade Phillips has done a great job with pressuring, sacking and hitting QB's. Our front 7 has been stellar.

Newman, Henry and Hamlin have been stellar ball hawks.

That Roy has been benched in passing situations speaks volumes to what Wade thinks of Roys coverage skills. Hats off to Wade doing the right thing. Roy is a coverage liability.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
smarta5150;1803919 said:
No one is saying he is a great cover guy.

You think you made your old name "BigBadRoy" (or whatever) because he locked down receivers? Should have been "ShutDownRoy" then. :rolleyes:

You did it because he hits people... really hard.

If you expected him to cover people with a 100% success rate than you built him up way too much in that head of yours.
a db drafted 8th overall should not be coming off the field on obvious passing downs.
 

2much2soon

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
89
smarta5150;1803916 said:
Was this 1 play or something? How about you get the video.

Still not buying it.

RW was NEVER a coverage safety.

People fell in love with him for hitting EVERYTHING. Not deflecting passes.

He is what he is. A run stopping SS who intimidates receivers across the middle.

bwahahahaha check it out. Its the first thing in this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2txV2zj8F5I

if you didn't know that Roy was once pretty good in coverage I am going to guess you are about 12 years old and just started watching football.
Nothing wrong with that if you are. Just educate yourself some before making crazy posts.
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
2much2soon;1803978 said:
bwahahahaha check it out. Its the first thing in this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2txV2zj8F5I

if you didn't know that Roy was once pretty good in coverage I am going to guess you are about 12 years old and just started watching football.
Nothing wrong with that if you are. Just educate yourself some before making crazy posts.

:laugh2:

Thats it, I am wrong. RW was an all Pro-Coverage-Safety.

My bad.

You act like RW hasn't had an INT all season.
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
LOL... and the 2nd play he takes a bad angle and horse collars a guy...

Like I said... SAME old Roy.
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
Bob Sacamano;1803990 said:
I keep forgetting

noone really is

Watch that highlight video.

Its funny, he takes bad angle after bad angle and no one ever complained.

Now all of a sudden people hate him for it.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
smarta5150;1803994 said:
Watch that highlight video.

Its funny, he takes bad angle after bad angle and no one ever complained.

Now all of a sudden people hate him for it.
cause he was making plays in that video. he wasn't getting beat in that vid.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Rampage;1803930 said:
a db drafted 8th overall should not be coming off the field on obvious passing downs.

Roy doesn't come off the field "on obvious passing downs." He comes off the field in certain defensive packages, mostly on first and second downs when we want to keep a 3-4 front but with three cornerbacks to press at the line.

He's been on the field for virtually every third down this season and almost every down that we've been in either a nickel or dime defense. If Wade thought he was any sort of "liability," THOSE would be the situations when he'd be taken off the field, not when we're in a 3-4 with guys like Bradie James and Akin Ayodele still on the field.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
AdamJT13;1804084 said:
Roy doesn't come off the field "on obvious passing downs." He comes off the field in certain defensive packages, mostly on first and second downs when we want to keep a 3-4 front but with three cornerbacks to press at the line.

He's been on the field for virtually every third down this season and almost every down that we've been in either a nickel or dime defense. If Wade thought he was any sort of "liability," THOSE would be the situations when he'd be taken off the field, not when we're in a 3-4 with guys like Bradie James and Akin Ayodele still on the field.

stoned!
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
AdamJT13;1804084 said:
Roy doesn't come off the field "on obvious passing downs." He comes off the field in certain defensive packages, mostly on first and second downs when we want to keep a 3-4 front but with three cornerbacks to press at the line.

He's been on the field for virtually every third down this season and almost every down that we've been in either a nickel or dime defense. If Wade thought he was any sort of "liability," THOSE would be the situations when he'd be taken off the field, not when we're in a 3-4 with guys like Bradie James and Akin Ayodele still on the field.

Roy has seen far less field time last few games. Phillips is getting him off the field far more in passing situations than in "past".

And major props to Wade for doing that, Roy is a coverage liability when on field in passing situations.

Ayodele has also seen a lot more bench time as Burnett has an expanded role/Playing time.
 

Cowboyz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,117
Reaction score
10,015
Let's see how objective some of you guys can really be.

Some of you won't admit he's a liability, but convienently can't explain his REMOVAL from his primary position (yes, the same position where you guys say name another SS, or he's a Pro Bowler, yadda, yadda, yadda) or even off the field. With you guys, it's as if it never happens.

Hmmm, they also take Spears off too in passing downs. Think that's a ringing endorsement of his pass rushing skills? But, I guess you guys have no problem with Spears being taken off of the field.

Others reluctantly agree that Roy's a liability, but can't admit that being removed from his primary position isn't exactly proving the coaches faith in his skills. Somehow, some of you have twisted it into some badge of honor.

And then there's this. I also have a TIVO and broke-down the Grant play, Zapruder-style:

First Camera Angle:

a.) As Grant takes the handoff, you see Akin approaching at the 40 yard line, then gets engaged by the blocker at the 39.
b.) At the same time, Spears gets driven BACK to the 40, along with James by another blocker, which opens the hole.
c.) Roy comes into frame at the 47 moving towards the hole and Hamlin also comes into frame at the 45 as Grant flies past the blocked Akin and Spears.
d.) Grant moves completely past Akin and Spears at the 41, with Roy at the 45 and Hamlin at the 44.
e.) A few more steps has Grant at the 43 with Hamlin leveling out at the 44 and Roy at the 45.
f.) As Grant reaches the 45, Hamlin is starting to trail back to the 45 a Grant is starting to pass him, meanwhile Roy is still as the 45 but starting to close the distance to Grant.
g.) As Grant, splits the two safeties, both Roy and Hamlin start to reach back to the 46 to try to grab him.
h.) Grant at the 47; Roy and Hamlin reaching in vain as Hamlin starts to slide underneath Roy. NOTE: The runner is two yards past Roy BEFORE he is tripped.
i.) Grant at the 50, Hamlin and Roy both on or falling to the ground.


Camera Angle from behind the offense.

Ball on left hash, with Roy lined up just to the right of the right hash (about 19 feet. Yes, I looked it up.) and Hamlin near the left-hand numbers (I'd say about 17 feet).

a.) As Farve hands-off to Grant (pretty much between the hashes), both Hamlin and Roy recognize the play and start to move forward.
b.) As Grant reaches the line, Hamlin appears to moveing quicker than Roy, although Roy's vision looks to be blocked by the traffic with Spears and James.
c.) Again Hamlin appears to have a direct line-of-site to Grant and Roy appears to pick him up a bit late as Grant passes the traffic.
d.) Grant splits them both, but Roy doesn't touch him.



Camera Angle from behind the defense.

a.) Grant runs through the hole past Akin and Spears.
b.) Hamlin enters the picture from the right, Roy from the left, FARTHER away from Grant.
c.) Hamlin actually makes and attempt to tackle Grant, even touching him, with Roy about 1-2 yards away.
d.) The both fall.

IMO, the biggest culprits on the play were Spears, who got manhandled, as well as Akin and James for failing to get off of the blockers. That said, the safeties (yes both of them) also failed in support (the name safety actually implies last line of defense), but the suggestion that Roy wasn't at fault because Hamlin tripped him is completely bogus.

While Hamlin had a better sight line, he also had further to run. He made it to Grant much faster than Roy. In fact, Hamlin looked to be running while Roy was in a pseudo jog.

Again, any apologist who blames Hamlin for tripping Roy isn't being subjective or honest for that matter. Roy had no shot given his blocked recognition and odd angle.

He was, by no means, entirely responsible for the Grant run, but he failed to help, as did Hamlin.

Bottom line? Roy's above average at run support (not a beast as some would imply) who can deliver the occasional big hit, but NO Sacks, NO tackles for losses and NO forced fumbles would indicate he's no longer a "game changer" that he was early in his career.

He's also a liability in the passing game.

That said, should a part-time player be the highest paid player on the team?
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Cowboyz88;1804096 said:
NO Sacks, NO tackles for losses and NO forced fumbles would indicate he's no longer a "game changer" that he was early in his career.

And yet, last year he had more takeaways than any other safety in the NFL. And he led all starting safeties in interceptions.


That said, should a part-time player be the highest paid player on the team?

Roy isn't even close to being the highest-paid player on the team.
 

Cowboyz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,117
Reaction score
10,015
smarta5150;1803983 said:
:laugh2:

You act like RW hasn't had an INT all season.

His two INTs — both with under 4 minutes left in blowout games — weren't exactly "game changing" plays, as both were garbage time picks.

Let's not make more of them than they are.
 

Cowboyz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,117
Reaction score
10,015
AdamJT13;1804102 said:
And yet, last year he had more takeaways than any other safety in the NFL. And he led all starting safeties in interceptions.

And last year, Mike Vick was a starting QB.
 
Top