TwoCentPlain
Numbnuts
- Messages
- 15,171
- Reaction score
- 11,084
At least McFadden won't be going to Washington, NYG, or Philly! At least I hope not. If Philly loses the remaining 6 games, they might have a shot at McFadden. Same with Wash.
big dog cowboy;1786099 said:I would rather sign Julius and keep the draft picks. That may not be a popular opinion around here I know.
Matt;1786175 said:BPA will be him.. imagine the possibliites..
Romo
TO, Glenn, Crayton
Witten
Our Oline
DMac and Barber...
and the way our D is picking things up could spell potential dynasty...
Wade's Defenses always seem to shine in the 2nd 3rd years anyway
Daudr;1785940 said:Let me preface this by saying that I haven't even watched him play a full game yet this year, but from what I've seen he doesn't look like the god that some people on here make him seem. To me he's an inferior version of Reggie Bush.
StanleySpadowski;1786273 said:All anyone needs to know about McFadden can be seen in his 73 yard TD. An elite speed back looked like he was running in wet concrete when he was being run down from behind until the QB threw a block downfield.
Looks great rolling up yardage against a bunch of guys that will be bagging groceries on Sundays next fall.
Yeah and that is why Tennessee and Auburn were able to shut him down, because they knew what was coming.GoinForSix;1785875 said:People don't watch enough SEC football, he's doing things to that conference no one has done since Mr. Walker. It's not a matter of if he's going to be good or not, its a matter of how great he is going to be. His offense is one-dimensional, and teams know exactly who is getting the ball, yet he still manages to break off huge runs (the only thing our offense lacks). If Jerry wants him, he's going to get him.
Yeah, 8 of LSU's 11 defensive starters will start at least 1 game in an NFL career. I think 5 or 6 will be longterm starters.dbair1967;1786328 said:huh? bagging groceries?
dude, that LSU defense is loaded...of their top 12-14 guys right now, at least half of them will likely be 1st day picks, maybe even more than that
this guy has run up huge numbers playing against the best talent in the country, he doesnt play in the WAC or some other crap conference
David
You are joking, right? Either that or you don't watch any college FB in which case you shouldn't be making such comment about the #1 team in the nation.StanleySpadowski;1786273 said:All anyone needs to know about McFadden can be seen in his 73 yard TD. An elite speed back looked like he was running in wet concrete when he was being run down from behind until the QB threw a block downfield.
Looks great rolling up yardage against a bunch of guys that will be bagging groceries on Sundays next fall.
03EBZ06;1786149 said:Lets create a hypothetical scenario...
1) lets say we'll need to get to 3rd pick to get DMac
2) lets say we'll get 30th pick this year and next year (even though I think it will be 32nd ).
3) lets say Browns 1st round pick end up at 20th.
3rd pick value points = 2,200 points
20th pick value points = 850
30th pick value points = 620 x 2 = 1,240 (keep in mind that 2009's draft pick is devalued for 2008 draft trade)
1,240 + 850 = 2,090 (not enough for 3rd pick)
add our 2008 3rd round draft pick = 124 + 2,090 = 2,214
So, we'll need give whoever 2008's two #1s, 2009 #1 and this year's 3rd round pick in order to get to 3rd pick in 2008.
Now, I understand the value chart isn't end all, be all but does give some guidelines for trade values.
big dog cowboy;1786201 said:Why not?
DCfaninDC;1786342 said:You are joking, right? Either that or you don't watch any college FB in which case you shouldn't be making such comment about the #1 team in the nation.
I mean there is that thing called freedom of speech and all, but I am trying to help you not look foolish.
tomson75;1785787 said:Pats will take Laurinaitis...just a hunch.
iceberg;1786359 said:here's an intereseting question.
would you trade both our #1's and next years #1, maybe 2 or 3, to the pats if it means mcfadden?
smarta5150;1786364 said:Thats like trading your soul to the Devil for a bag of peanuts...
Because its McFadeen though you can choose your preference of salted or unsalted.
iceberg;1786368 said:think of the irony. you lose your late round 1st for cheating and wind up with 2-3. all better than your own.
i'd not do it cause we're not 1 player away and because i think we can find a good back elsewhere. either in the draft or FA. CB, WR and maybe FS are all more important than RB. if we lose jones, put RB above FS and *maybe* WR, but we've got other needs to fix on D. do we need to make our #2 offense *that* much better? if we could stop the pats now we'd be able to win.
smarta5150;1786373 said:I agree.
I have been tired of all the McFadden threads... I mean, talk about the guy and how much of a stud he is but we have the #2 offense (which could easily be #1 if the Pats stopped padding their stats ) and a 2-back system that is working.
Also, like you said, we have a few needs that we can help out with our multiple-1st round picks.
Definitely not worth it.
Aikbach;1786380 said:Personally I hope Dallas keeps Julius but if not that Felix Jones is one shifty cat ( bad pun that I just realized I accidentally made but am too lazy to erase so I'll type an explanation of it instead, go figure).
trickblue;1785783 said:He is a special back... Peterson-esque...