Are you good enough to be an analyst? If not, welllllllllll...............C'mon, your better than that aren't you? So you have to be good enough to play in the NFL to have an opinion at CZ? With that logic, uhhh, nevermind.
EVERY NFL MIND in the country, (except that of DC HOMERS) are saying the same thing. Weeden wasn't good in Cleveland, and isn't any good in Dallas. He should be able to cover Tony for one game against the worst team in the NFL, but isn't trusted enough by his team or his coaches to do so. This has nothing to do with my opinion, it's all clear factOIDS brother.... You don't have to be good enough to start in the NFL to have make any of those statements. You might have to have a little CS though. Or you might need to take the rosies off for a few minutes. The best thing for Tony is rest. He could have sat out the rest of the Washington game, the entire Arizona game, the Jacksonville game, had a bye week, and a long week, then came in completely rested and healthy for what will be a treacherous last half of the season. He could go for 400 and 4 and win this game, but if he takes a hit in the 4th quarter and aggravates his piece-milled back, will it be worth it? Or could we have prepped a little better and not had this worry at all?