How's our draft position looking?

[cej757]

Hargreaves or Robinson

I'll be pissed if we draft Hargreaves that high. He's way too short to play on the outside.

 

[Clove]

This is probably the highest we will pick in a while, IMO. Now is the time to get a QB. For those saying we should not, and go for another position because the QB is not guaranteed to be any good, then what makes you think those other positions will be any good? IMO, the entire draft is a shot in the dark. But without a future QB, I do know we're looking at possibly going 30 years without a SB.

 

[Cowboyz88]

Problem is first round qbs are far from guaranteed players. What if you groom a qb for a couple years and he ends up being a Weeden or Geno Smith or Ponder? And we miss the opportunity to get. JJ Watt or Wagner type player?

I don't envy the scouts in this draft. They have to be 100% right, or it could set us back years

Given all the busts, I understand the concern, but the flip side is what if you groom a QB and he's the next Rodgers, Rivers, Manning, etc.?

Then, we've set ourselves up (theoretically) for the next 10+ years.

Truth is that first round, any positions are far from guaranteed players, so you just have to hope you've done your due diligence and roll the dice.

And if you're going to hit, isn't it best to hit on the most important position on the field?

 

[IAmLegend]

I've said it once and I'll say it again: Give me Goff.

 

[SilverStarCowboy]

If we land at 4 or 8 the pick is LB because Dallas will sign a FA Vet at QB....i.e. KaperPICK, RGinjury or Johnson Football.

 

[tyke1doe]

If Dallas wins against skins (which I think they will):

1. TEN 3-13 (plays at Indy) (SOS .492)
2. CLE 3-13 (home against Steelers) (SOS .534)
3. SD 4-12 (at Denver) (SOS .523)
4. Miami 5-11 (home against NE) (SOS .449)
5. Jacksonville 5-11 (at Houston) (SOS .469)
6. Dallas 5-11 (home against Commanders) (SOS .538)
7. San Fran 5-11 (at home against Rams) (SOS .552)

If Dallas loses against skins (unlikely but possible):

1. TEN 3-13 (plays at Indy) (SOS .492)
2. CLE 3-13 (home against Steelers) (SOS .534)
3. SD 4-12 (at Denver) (SOS .523)
4. Dallas 4-12 (home against Commanders) (SOS .538)
5. Miami 5-11 (home against NE) (SOS .449)
6. Jacksonville 5-11 (at Houston) (SOS .469)
7. Dallas 5-11 (home against Commanders) (SOS .538)
8. San Fran 5-11 (at home against Rams) (SOS .552)

Based on your scenarios, if Dallas finishes 4-12, they're in the second cat bird's seat.
Tennessee doesn't need a quarterback. They could conceivably trade with the Browns to assure Cleveland gets Lynch or they could trade with San Francisco, though I don't think they want to drop down THAT far unless they get a lot in return.
Cleveland needs a quarterback so they won't be making any trades. San Diego needs a LT, and I doubt they want to miss out on Tunsil.
That leaves the Cowboys, who can either take Goff (I think it's too high for Goff, personally) or trade down And pick up extra picks in the second or third.

 

[tyke1doe]

No, they need Goff to fall so the Niners trade a boat load to move up to get him. Take Wentz in the second.

I'm good with that.

 

[FLcowboy]

just deactivate Sean lee ,that should guarantee a victory.

Yeah. Why is he even on the field. We know how good he is, it's time to test the wanna-bees

 

[FLcowboy]

Based on your scenarios, if Dallas finishes 4-12, they're in the second cat bird's seat.
Tennessee doesn't need a quarterback. They could conceivably trade with the Browns to assure Cleveland gets Lynch or they could trade with San Francisco, though I don't think they want to drop down THAT far unless they get a lot in return.
Cleveland needs a quarterback so they won't be making any trades. San Diego needs a LT, and I doubt they want to miss out on Tunsil.
That leaves the Cowboys, who can either take Goff (I think it's too high for Goff, personally) or trade down And pick up extra picks in the second or third.

Or trade down and get another first. Who's out there with two firsts?

 

[FLcowboy]

not a chance. if he gets injured, they're on the hook for16 mil.

Colt McCoy will start

How is RG3 going to get hurt from Dallas'pass rush?

 

[bayeslife]

I hope we don't. We need a team to take them before we're up.

This is probably the highest we will pick in a while, IMO. Now is the time to get a QB. For those saying we should not, and go for another position because the QB is not guaranteed to be any good, then what makes you think those other positions will be any good? IMO, the entire draft is a shot in the dark. But without a future QB, I do know we're looking at possibly going 30 years without a SB.

This 100%.

As long as Romo is QB we won't draft this high again. And we actually have the first choice of QB too.

 

[SilverStarCowboy]

Luv to draft a QB, just don't see that being the choice of this organization.

 

[tyke1doe]

This 100%.

As long as Romo is QB we won't draft this high again. And we actually have the first choice of QB too.

I agree, but it doesn't mean we have to take one in the first.

 

[tyke1doe]

Or trade down and get another first. Who's out there with two firsts?

No one has two first round picks this year. The Pats don't have a pick because of Deflate Gate.

 

[waving monkey]

No, they need Goff to fall so the Niners trade a boat load to move up to get him. Take Wentz in the second.

Wentz wont be there in the second IMO after the visits and conbine he'll move up the board

 

[waving monkey]

No, they need Goff to fall so the Niners trade a boat load to move up to get him. Take Wentz in the second.

Niners trade up to the 1st over all or second over all for Goof is my thoughts
Everything turns on the Browns and Manzeil

 

[waving monkey]

This is probably the highest we will pick in a while, IMO. Now is the time to get a QB. For those saying we should not, and go for another position because the QB is not guaranteed to be any good, then what makes you think those other positions will be any good? IMO, the entire draft is a shot in the dark. But without a future QB, I do know we're looking at possibly going 30 years without a SB.

I agree with everything you said except the last sentence

 

[Clove]

Based on your scenarios, if Dallas finishes 4-12, they're in the second cat bird's seat.
Tennessee doesn't need a quarterback. They could conceivably trade with the Browns to assure Cleveland gets Lynch or they could trade with San Francisco, though I don't think they want to drop down THAT far unless they get a lot in return.
Cleveland needs a quarterback so they won't be making any trades. San Diego needs a LT, and I doubt they want to miss out on Tunsil.
That leaves the Cowboys, who can either take Goff (I think it's too high for Goff, personally) or trade down And pick up extra picks in the second or third.

No offense to you in particular, but you don't just trade down, you need another team to play ball.

 

[Doomsday]

No, they need Goff to fall so the Niners trade a boat load to move up to get him. Take Wentz in the second.

There is always one QB who jumps up draft boards each year, this year I will put my money on Wentz doing so. He is going to end up a top 15 pick I bet.

 

[edmon]

If Dallas wins against skins (which I think they will):

1. TEN 3-13 (plays at Indy) (SOS .492)
2. CLE 3-13 (home against Steelers) (SOS .534)
3. SD 4-12 (at Denver) (SOS .523)
4. Miami 5-11 (home against NE) (SOS .449)
5. Jacksonville 5-11 (at Houston) (SOS .469)
6. Dallas 5-11 (home against Commanders) (SOS .538)
7. San Fran 5-11 (at home against Rams) (SOS .552)

If Dallas loses against skins (unlikely but possible):

1. TEN 3-13 (plays at Indy) (SOS .492)
2. CLE 3-13 (home against Steelers) (SOS .534)
3. SD 4-12 (at Denver) (SOS .523)
4. Dallas 4-12 (home against Commanders) (SOS .538)
5. Miami 5-11 (home against NE) (SOS .449)
6. Jacksonville 5-11 (at Houston) (SOS .469)
7. Dallas 5-11 (home against Commanders) (SOS .538)
8. San Fran 5-11 (at home against Rams) (SOS .552)

So if we win we get the 6 pick, but if we lose we get 4 and 7. I'm all in on tanking now.