Doomsday101
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 107,762
- Reaction score
- 39,034
Seems crazy, but then again, how the heck have the Fitzpatricks, McCowns, Cassels, Sanchez', Hoyers, Weedens, etc. remained in the league? Because there aren't that many great QBs in the league to go around and they rarely, RARELY become available. For less money than a Mike Glennon, a team can get a cheap rental in Romo with zero guaranteed money involved. If his back explodes week 6 in 2017...that sucks...but you can release him and not have anything tied up for 2018 or 2019..
They don't cost much and no one is giving up picks to get them. Right now teams have to be concerned how many games can Romo play? If Dallas did not have Dak I'm sure many here would be concerned about Romo ability to remain in the lineup. I don't say this out of some hate for the guy I am and have been a big Romo fan but just as it happened with Aikman you start seeing that the end of the line is coming. Thankfully in this case the Cowboys do have a QB to rely on unlike when Troy left. For me it is not a matter can Romo play, I think he can but my concerns are can he play a majority of the season? can he be healthy late in the season? I have no doubt teams who may be interested have those same concerns, yes they will bring him in if it is not costing them much in terms of draft picks or players but no one is going to take a big risk on Romo