Dre11
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,686
- Reaction score
- 11,450
Yeah even if Lamb does not alter his route and somehow makes that catch he gets laid out!
Ok? Wr take big hits all the time. He's suppose to be a 1
Yeah even if Lamb does not alter his route and somehow makes that catch he gets laid out!
Its this simple and anybody that thinks otherwise is just a Dak homer and shouldnt be taken seriouslyHow was it the right read? The safety was directly in Dak's line of sight the entire play. Dak was looking at the spot the entire time. The safety read his eyes & made the play. Dak had every reason to know the guy was there and bad things were likely. Throw the ball elsewhere or throw it away & go to halftime.
Moose, who should be in the HOF for his role in helping Emmitt be the all time leading rusher, who's played the game, he said it was on Lamb. I haven't even read the comments yet but I bet there's about 10 Dak haters here that are arguing with you and Moose by saying that the INT was on Dak. Now let me read the comments to see the regular Dak haters here disputing yours and Moose's claim. lol
Of course he did...he is a leader. Not going to throw him under the bus.Watched Dak's postgame press conference and he took the blame. Said it was a case of him trusting his arm too much and thinking he can get away with passes like that.
Watched Dak's postgame press conference and he took the blame. Said it was a case of him trusting his arm too much and thinking he can get away with passes like that.
Both safeties were right there, and #4 read the play the entire way. Odds of a catch were almost 0, odds of lamb getting yards after the catch was 0. Not saying Lamb shouldn't have ran a better route and it ends up as a harmless incompletion, but this was not a good decision to make the throw to begin with.Yes it's the right read, if you look it's only the safety there if he misses Lamb is running 50-60 yards at least.
What are you talking about?Dak is a leader. Of course he's saying it's his fault. Show me a press conference by him criticizing Lamb or any receiver for dropping passes last year or any year he's been our QB. I don't think you can.
How was it the right read? The safety was directly in Dak's line of sight the entire play. Dak was looking at the spot the entire time. The safety read his eyes & made the play. Dak had every reason to know the guy was there and bad things were likely. Throw the ball elsewhere or throw it away & go to halftime.
And the big "hits" aren't even big anymore bc of the rules lolOk? Wr take big hits all the time. He's suppose to be a 1
You're absolutely right, but the idea that CeeDee ran a bad route and Dak shouldn't have thrown it can both be true at the same time. Not sure why it has to be one or the other.Wow..what is sturm looking at?
Ceedee ran a worse lazy route than even i thought initially
It isn't up to him to decide to quit on a route btw.
Both safeties were right there, and #4 read the play the entire way. Odds of a catch were almost 0, odds of lamb getting yards after the catch was 0. Not saying Lamb shouldn't have ran a better route and it ends up as a harmless incompletion, but this was not a good decision to make the throw to begin with.
You're absolutely right, but the idea that CeeDee ran a bad route and Dak shouldn't have thrown it can both be true at the same time. Not sure why it has to be one or the other.
I was extremely impressed with Dak yesterday, but this was the one throw that he seemed to feel invincible on.
Gotta disagree with you. Lamb was there - he was at the spot. The throw was right on target for the route Lamb ran. The problem was that the defense was also there. It's up to Dak to read the defense and know where the safety is.
I agree....i have a much BIGGER issue with throwing the ball there anyway. A lot bad can happen whenever you pass. This is an example...You're absolutely right, but the idea that CeeDee ran a bad route and Dak shouldn't have thrown it can both be true at the same time. Not sure why it has to be one or the other.
I was extremely impressed with Dak yesterday, but this was the one throw that he seemed to feel invincible on.
BULLsnotBoth safeties were right there, and #4 read the play the entire way. Odds of a catch were almost 0, odds of lamb getting yards after the catch was 0. Not saying Lamb shouldn't have ran a better route and it ends up as a harmless incompletion, but this was not a good decision to make the throw to begin with.
Either way I'm not sure that ball needs to be thrown.The problem with that statement is Dak is in the motion of throwing that ball before Lamb quits.
Either way I'm not sure that ball needs to be thrown.
For whatever it is worth PFF graded that as a throw that was NOT turnover worthy, which I agree with. Lamb running a poor route was the reason for the INT, I just dont see any upside to it. A perfect route by Lamb is still most likely an incompletion.
Who gets more of the blame? Who cares is really the point i'm trying to make. Lamb needs to at very least break that play up. Dak needs to not play superman up multiple scores against an inferior team.
Yes he's taking a hit, he's a number 1 for a reason, Dez, Irvin , and the top Wrs take big hits all the time. That's a cop out. The situation was they were aggressive all game, they were doing what we all wanted them to do in the past, put their foot on the neck of the opponent, now we want to go soft...lol