Section446
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,941
- Reaction score
- 11,619
As average as he's been, every draft pick deserves 3 years before you start throwing around the "B" word.
Semantics.
Not at all. The words mean different things.
A bust can't play in this league. That's definitely not the case with Claiborne. He's struggled with strength for press coverage, and with health somewhat. But he's shown potential and given us plenty of starting snaps.
Listen to what Scandrick has to say about him sometime.
I can't believe anyone can actually defend his play of last year. He was awful.
He's had 2 int's and 1 fumble recovery in 2 years. Pro Football Focus ranked him 90th among 110 qualifying corners. He was beaten for an average of 16.6 yards per catch, which was the seventh-highest rate in the NFL. He gave up seven catches on eight targets in Week 4 against San Diego and six on seven three weeks later in Philadelphia. Riley Cooper abused him badly in that game. In that game, he gave up 3 4th quarter completions for first downs facing 3rd string QB Barkley.
No it doesn't, it speaks to the development of the 6th overall pick or lack thereof.
LOL, PFF is a joke, and really, the Philly game? The one where the QB's had 194 yds combined, 3 4th qtr. ints, and got a whole 3 points only because of a turnover? That game? Garbage time prevent defense stats, really? Exactly what I thought. This whole "Claiborne" was awful is based ENTIRELY off a few plays from the opener, and the San Diego (where he struggle facing Allen - who is pretty good it turns out).
He has been pretty awful - better health and another training camp might help, but he has a really long way to go to even get to average IMO.
Seeing that the average completion percentage for a QB is ~55%, I get the sense that you have no sense of twhat the mean really is.
.
LOL, PFF is a joke, and really, the Philly game? The one where the QB's had 194 yds combined, 3 4th qtr. ints, and got a whole 3 points only because of a turnover? That game? Garbage time prevent defense stats, really? Exactly what I thought. This whole "Claiborne" was awful is based ENTIRELY off a few plays from the opener, and the San Diego (where he struggle facing Allen - who is pretty good it turns out).
It looks like we
Premature Evaluation!
I have no sense in twhat you are referring to. I never mentioned any specific completion %, nor did I reference PFF. You seem to have issued a of non sequitur here, perhaps you meant to reply to someone else?
You asked for examples and stats, and he gave them to you. Now, they aren't good enough. Judging an individual's performance on the football field is very subjective. The fact that he only started 7 games last year is really all you need to know.
This guy was billed as the next Deion Sanders by the FO. We traded our #2 pick to select him #6 overall. It looks like we will be extremely lucky for him to be Terence Newman. People ragged on Mike Jenkins, but he was much better at this point in his career and was a lot lower draft pick.
You got sucked then. If you want to buy the hyperbole coming out of Jerry Jones's mouth that is on you. Just like it is on you that you think pff is a valid metric.
pff attributes a completion to 'the closest defender.' Seeing that we played a whole lot of zone and the nature of what happens to relative position when people get beat or miss assignments it should be obvious that the attribution does not necessarily mean the individual was culpable.
My point is that your standards for what is average is not based on anything but whim it seems.