Fla Cowpoke
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,043
- Reaction score
- 12,058
What you're saying is that we ****ed up by cutting Sendejo. Heath is worse than Sendajo.
Not even close. Sendejo is not better than Heath.
What you're saying is that we ****ed up by cutting Sendejo. Heath is worse than Sendajo.
Lmao, Heath is not worse than Sendejo. Heath is way more of a playmaker than himWhat you're saying is that we ****ed up by cutting Sendejo. Heath is worse than Sendajo.
Lmao, Heath is not worse than Sendejo. Heath is way more of a playmaker than him
Lmao, Heath is not worse than Sendejo. Heath is way more of a playmaker than him
Not even close. Sendejo is not better than Heath.
Lmao, Heath is not worse than Sendejo. Heath is way more of a playmaker than him
Lmao, at using pff..."
Two years ago, the #Vikings took a chance on Sendejo with a 4-yr deal.
It's paid off big time. Last year he was @PFF's #11 safety. The #NFL1000 had him as the 5th-best FS, one spot ahead of Earl Thomas.
Now they have a near pro-bowl-caliber safety under contract for pennies: https://t.co/ZjoEKlmVCK"
Gtfoh hahah
I thought that all you would have, of course. You tried using box stats to compare DBs lmao. How moronicLmao, at using pff...
How bout we see how he does at the position he was drafted for before calling him a bust?Every team needs JAGs to fill the roster. Heath was thrust into a starting role when he wasn’t ready in 2013 due to unjuries and the hate from that will never be overcome. The roster can’t have Pro Bowl players across the board. For a JAG and one of our weak links, he isn’t as bad as many attempt to make him out to be. I wouldn’t mind an upgrade but I’m not looking at Heath as a scapegoat. Byron Jones being a first round pick has disappointed me much more than Heath has because I expect more out of a 1st round pick.
How bout we see how he does at the position he was drafted for before calling him a bust?
He's been a quality starter at Safety. Nothing spectacular. But I think he will be a better corner. Can't blame coaching decisions on the player.There's different levels of bust, it's very subjective.
Byron was fantastic his rookie year, even better his sophomore year but not as big of a jump as you'd hope for out of a young guy, then regressed majorly last year in his tackling. Statistically waz still one of the best slot corners in the league.
At this point I'm not sure we will be able to get the value back on the resource we used to get him, pick #28. Which I think it what the poster before was using as his definition of bust. Truly any player that has consistently been average-above average is not a bust but I wont get into that.
Then there's a player that has been below average, will receive a small 2nd contract. Ex. DJ Swearinger
Then a player that was so bad he didnt make it onto a 2nd teams final roster. Ex Bjorn Werner
Different levels of busts
Didn’t realize I called him a bust. Let me reread what I wrote and verify.How bout we see how he does at the position he was drafted for before calling him a bust?
Some players are labeled on one play. Romo the botched field goal made him a choker, Heath being trucked by Peterson at the goall line.
I agree with Panchucko.
Heath was below average as a rookie with some highlight reel bad plays. He's gotten better but the rookie season and highlight reel bad plays have stuck with some fans. In saying that I don't think he's a better player than Church was so I wouldn't agree with the best since Woody/Roy implications. I do think Heath is still improving though, which is a testament to his fantastic work ethic. Interestingly I like him better in a deeper role than as a box safety, if there's a weakness in his game it's that I think he misses too many tackles.
I’ve yet to see anything supporting your claims. I’m still waiting to hear what games Heath was bad in besides Denver and St. Louis. (Crickets)Some posters just desperately need Heath to not be awful.
He is, but their dreams and beliefs need to be justified.