IndianaCowboys1994
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,082
- Reaction score
- 1,044
And from the sounds of it, it sounds like he is close to Gurley...1000% ........ my exact issue with Zeke. Wanna new deal with two years left, fine but there's a price
And from the sounds of it, it sounds like he is close to Gurley...1000% ........ my exact issue with Zeke. Wanna new deal with two years left, fine but there's a price
The two division games scare me a little bit. If Dallas Comes out motivated then they'll be 3-0. But Dallas hasn't been 3-0 since 2008 (missed the playoffs that year btw)...History has said in the Garrett era they start off 2-1.Why. Did the league cancel those games and give us the win?
Dak is not going to have a huge year without Zeke[/B]. The run game will not be effective without Zeke.
In game adjustments will confuse a rookie OC.
Base defenses (no one in Cowboys backfield to command stack fronts) and heavy blitzes will seriously disrupt Dak and the passing game.
And from the sounds of it, it sounds like he is close to Gurley...
I'll say this............... there is a very small silver lining here.
We get to see Dak without Elliott. If Dak truly is this ascending, developing QB that is on the cusp of being one of the greats in football and deserving of a massive, Top 3ish contract.............. then there should be no excuses for his performances starting the year.
But if he and the offense struggle, it feeds the notion that he needs Elliott. And in that case, the Cowboys might be foolish paying him what he wants.
Hopefully Zeke wakes up, fires his management team and accepts the generous offer. Then he can blame the whole thing on his agent or Faulk,,, his teammates will have a reason to like him again.
His teammates don't dislike him. They understand the business of the game because they're in it. It's fans who are "uncomfortable" with high dollar squabbling that raises their anxiety.
3-0 is very possibleIf we win games without Zeke, not only is he flushing game checks down the toilet, any leverage he thinks he has evaporates as well.
Zeke has the most to lose in this staring contest. There is no reason for the FO to change their position unless there is a serious injury to Pollard or the running game just craters.
I could easily see us winning the first three games out of the gate, and that will place tremendous pressure on Zeke and his camp.
I'm just amazed at how badly he's misread the Jones family. They would (and have) done anything for him, there was a big fat contract waiting for him after this season and the undying loyalty of some very powerful people.
Jerry motioned late last night that the hold-out could extend well past the season opener.
There's business and then there's ego and greed,,, these guys have a season on the line and their own dwindling pieces of pie to worry about.
The Cowboys haven't had the privilege of having RB of Zeke's level since Emmitt.Dak is not going to have a huge year without Zeke. The run game will not be effective without Zeke.
In game adjustments will confuse a rookie OC.
Base defenses (no one in Cowboys backfield to command stack fronts) and heavy blitzes will seriously disrupt Dak and the passing game.
NOOOOOOOOOOO!https://www.bloggingtheboys.com/pla...york-giants-in-week-1-without-ezekiel-elliott
(Mods please edit/fix Zeke’s name in title )
Jerry Jones on Ezekiel Elliott: "I'm operating as though right now he's going to miss regular season games. My entire expectation for what we're putting together as a team right now would anticipate with him holding out ... that he's going to miss games. I just accept that."
The two years left thing is part of it.He wants to be the highest paid RB in the league. In the past 3 years, he has been. Where's the greed there?
That's my point....That's fine by me but no way in hell he should get more than Gurley money with 2 years left on the old deal.