Silver N Blue
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,342
- Reaction score
- 8,982
man I am really starting to getting nervous since JG's presser has not started...
I'm going to make a educated guess that given the fact that he was not moving around very well, and I don't know...had to have a shot to deal with the pain that, yeah, he was probably in pain.
He's tough as hell. I've never denied that. But sometimes you have to save players from themselves as well cause sometimes their toughness, and their pride, over-rides what is possibly best for the team.
Like I've said I have no trouble with Romo going back in. He's the leader. He wanted in. They let him in. I'm fine with that.
I also can see why other people are not, and would have preferred to stay with Weeden given those circumstances. I also, just to point it out, know that Weeden lead 2 drives for 10 points, including the only screen play that I recall to combat that blitz, in his very limited time while Romo was getting hammered by the blitz and only put up 7 points.
This isn't about Romo vs. Weeden because Romo is far and away the better QB and the best option for Dallas in 99.999% of situations.
It's just quite possibly that in this situation there is a chance that it might have been better to go with Weeden given the situation Romo was in.
again you have medical people there they are checking him out if they felt he was at a big risk I'm sure they would say. I don't make calls like that unless I have the full information and we don't get that in our living rooms. Are we to sit Romo any time he gets dinged up from here on out? If all this is was a bruise even a painful one then do we now sit him?
On the contrary, I am not in the least opposed to the Cowboys finding Romo's successor nor would I take issue with the Cowboys using a first round pick. I absolutely agree the Cowboys should address this sooner than later...based on what we saw in preseason, they may have already found him with Dustin Vaughan. Of course, we will have to see how he has progressed next year.
What I would argue is that I don't think going to the Super Bowl is beyond Romo's ability. But alot of other issues will have to get corrected before the Cowboys can get there and I don't believe the onus is squarely on Romo to do so. It is and always has been a team - which includes the coaches - effort. On this, though, we will have to agree to not agree, as I'm certain neither one of us will change the others mind.
But he was in pain before the Giants game and had to have a shot to play - does that mean he shouldn't have played?
I have seen nothing that tells me he wasn't in physical condition to return to the game. He seemed to be moving around just fine on the last play of the game.
Weeden did a nice job, but let's be real - on the field goal Murray took us down the field with that 51 yard run, and took that screen pass 20 something yards on the next drive. Weeden then hit Witten on a wide open pass with seemingly no defender within 20 feet of him.
I'm not trying to knock what he did. He was excellent - but let's not make it seem like he was out there evading defenders and tossing darts all over the field. I don't think he did anything that Romo couldn't have done.
I'm sure that they couldn't have known. You can only know this if you have an MRI. My understanding is that they did not have access to that. No way they could have known for certain.
Again he showed them he could go Garrett made the call right or wrong that is each person own view but at least theirs is based on a heck of a lot more than you or I know. These people are not stupid as much as many here like to think. They do have an understanding and a knowledge that we do not have as fans. Yes it is great to second guess but it is done on very limited information. If MRI comes back and confirms what they already feel is the situation then what will people say? They got lucky?
Watch the game again. Watch the velocity he has on the ball when he comes back in. His 1st pass should have been a pick but the DB dropped it.
Jerry got good news on Romo. He wanted to tell Garrett directly. Jerry was likely massively relieved to learn that Tony was alright. He wanted to share that with Garrett who he knew would also be massively relieved. I can't believe people are making an issue out of this. Clearly he wasn't telling Garrett who to play, because you'd never play Weeden if Romo was OK to go.
How did he show them he could go?
But he was in pain before the Giants game and had to have a shot to play - does that mean he shouldn't have played?
I have seen nothing that tells me he wasn't in physical condition to return to the game. He seemed to be moving around just fine on the last play of the game.
Weeden did a nice job, but let's be real - on the field goal Murray took us down the field with that 51 yard run, and took that screen pass 20 something yards on the next drive. Weeden then hit Witten on a wide open pass with seemingly no defender within 20 feet of him.
I'm not trying to knock what he did. He was excellent - but let's not make it seem like he was out there evading defenders and tossing darts all over the field. I don't think he did anything that Romo couldn't have done.
Jerry got good news on Romo. He wanted to tell Garrett directly. Jerry was likely massively relieved to learn that Tony was alright. He wanted to share that with Garrett who he knew would also be massively relieved. I can't believe people are making an issue out of this. Clearly he wasn't telling Garrett who to play, because you'd never play Weeden if Romo was OK to go.
I don't think it is clear that was what Jerry was telling the coach. Jerry should have stayed upstairs and let the professionals do their jobs. Inserting his 2 cents during games has always been a problem. How do you think he got the moniker "Coach Jones".
Garret's presser 30 min late
he was able to move and escape from the pocket and I'm sure as he was warming back up they monitored him. He was hit again once he returned had no problem after that and had it been his back he there would be no way of hiding it yet he got right back up. In the end you think he should not have played fine, that is your opinion
Well, how was this proof? They sent him in before he did any of this. All I saw was a bunch of soft throw and he had zero zip on his ball.
Yes, in the end I don't think he should have played and I don't think there was any way that they could have know if he really was 100% OK. That's correct.