timb2
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,104
- Reaction score
- 19,652
What is interesting is I get called a Warren Commission shill, yet I have made several posts saying that they got things wrong.
1. They tended to not push witnesses that could have helped their case.
2. They got the shot sequence wrong. They assumed that the Zapruder film captured the entire thing it didn't. Based on testimony of several people on the corner of Houston and Elm and someone filming from the TSBD, that took photos at the shot or stopped filming after it, it showed that the first shot likely occurred just after the limo turned and before Zapruder began filming again. That does several things that caused questions to be asked by conspiracy theorists. It shortened the shooting time to 6 seconds, when in fact it was over 11 and plenty of time to take three shots. It also conflicted with the testimony of the Connally's who were certain he was hit by the second shot, which again made the time element crucial because Oswald could not cycle through another shot that fast.
3. The wound drawings were not made to illustrate Kennedy's position as he was shot, so they appear to alter what is seen in the Zapruder film.
4. They did not go into detail of the positions of Kennedy and Connally at the time they were hit. By failing to report that Connally was seated much lower and farther left, it allowed for the zig-zag path that the conspiracy theorists used to ridicule the Single Bullet Theory.
5. They also failed to mention the importance of the keyhole and ragged wounds Connally had, and the lack of bullet wipe. These factors are proof that the bullet that struck Connally hit something first.
The House Assassination Committee made critical mistakes too. They used bogus acoustic evidence to prove a conspiracy. They showed that all the evidence proved Oswald wounded and killed the President and wounded Connally, but that the echo of a shot from the knoll matched the recording so there was a second shooter, who missed. They could not find any evidence of a shot from the grassy knoll beyond the acoustic evidence, nor could they find any direct link to anyone being involved. Remove the acoustic stuff and Oswald acted alone. The committee completely dismissed guys like Groden and Wecht as being unreliable, only to base their findings on a completely bogus science that was shown to be entirely wrong.
What do Schills do? They try to discredit others of a opposing view in the eyes of the public. This is what I do know,when a conspiracy topic comes up on this webpage you are right there to discredit it. USA had groups propagate to influence others. Businesses have done the same thing to market or persuade opinion. Some just like to go againist the grain to get a rise out of people. Even the CIA had a plan supposedly defunked now Operation Chaos to influence public opinion.. Schills like at these Televagelist sermons who fall down in the crowd when the minister waves his hand. Trying to persuade others in the crowd that the minister is not a con-man but has a gift..
No one would know anything about JFK if people did not stand their ground taking taunts being told they are delusional or the tin foil hat is on too tight and look over your shoulder for the men are ready to take to the funny farm,etc.. No one would have known of the connections that make JFK a conspiracy..