links18
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 24,322
- Reaction score
- 20,086
The Commanders name was developed before the civil rights movement and the political correctness movement. Before this, there were all types of team names we would consider to be strange today: The Washington Bullets, Colt .45s (hard to name a team after weapons these days) and in the "Negro Leagues" there were actually teams called "Baltimore Black Sox", "New York Ethiopians," "New York Cubans," etc. Those names are all but memories now, but for some reason the Commanders name was able to survive the change in political and cultural sensitivities. Why? I have no idea. But for some reason our society continues to tolerate it. Is it because it is sports? People display a strange psychological attachment to sports teams that over rides rationality in many cases. Why haven't we seen a movement to boycott the franchise if it is so offensive to people? Fans could refuse to go to Commanders games, players could refuse to play for the team. But that just doesn't happen. I guess it just isn't that important to people in the context of their psychological attachment to sports history. People in DC are not willing to give up their attachment to their team and its history. Are we willing to give up the attachment to the history of our greatest rivalry over this? If we are, there are things we could do about it. Refuse to show up at the Sept 28th game for one. That would send a message.......