Death Star
Active Member
- Messages
- 363
- Reaction score
- 35
kartr said:That's just it. We were tood deep at linebacker, but not deep enough at receiver, quarterback,OL. Parcells seems to over-emphasize some positions and under-emphasize others which shows some inconsistency and confusion about how to achieve balance.
Oh really? Was that the case? Because at the time EVERY mock I'd seen before the draft had us taking a LB in the first, the only question was WHICH LB.
Remember this was before the Ellis experiment and a constantly discussed need of ours was a great young OLB to start opposite Ware. But don't let the facts get the way of your revisionist history.
For the record, the mocks I'd seen pre-draft had OLB, OL and FS as our biggest needs, along with a WR and NT somewhere in the 2nd day.