McClay (2017) on Rico in practice - "We can't stop him" against 1st teamers **merged**

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
34,691
Reaction score
19,925
waldoputty said:
can argue logically without twisting facts.
now u r calling names :lmao:
Click to expand...
I provided facts... you cant' read them or perhaps too much for you to understand...

amazing that you rely on others opinions to form yours, not showing ability to form your own, based on evidence...every article and every post provided has been somebody saying something, not of your own logic...interesting
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
34,691
Reaction score
19,925
waldoputty said:
even if it was an opinion piece, doubtful SI would allow a piece that is total BS factually.
too bad ur facts are twisted with ur bias based on over-extending ur opinion on rico.
Click to expand...
so SI is god of all sports related items.....right? now if I show you an SI article that says rico is over his head, what will you say? are you ready for that?

and when you present facts, I will respond. you present somebody else's opinion...then....you know..you get what you deserve
 
waldoputty

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
CowboysFaninHouston said:
I provided facts... you cant' read them or perhaps too much for you to understand...

amazing that you rely on others opinions to form yours, not showing ability to form your own, based on evidence...every article and every post provided has been somebody saying something, not of your own logic...interesting
Click to expand...

neither u or i r football coaches or experts.
i rely on the standard approach where u rely on credible sources, but then draw logical conclusions from them.
for example, if one evaluation is from mcclay and one from garrett, i would rely on mcclay after a quick check of the facts.
scientific publications r usually written this way.
references r a respected and respectful way of rational discussions
 
MRV52

MRV52

rat2k8
Messages
8,789
Reaction score
9,863
waldoputty said:
think the practices were held in the 2016-2017 season. though the articles were written ~May 2017 so that would be around when the statements are 'current'
Click to expand...

Sorry should have read the article thought it was current LOL!!!! Now my hopes are dashed about Rico.
 
waldoputty

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
CowboysFaninHouston said:
!? what!!! :huh:
Click to expand...

yep, lots of people like u.
mostly because they cannot see the upside, cannot handle the uncertainty, and want immediate gratification.
one even attack a MD member on cz because the medical opinion taught against his personal agenda.
even accused the MD as a fake MD, which actually is a crime.
one of the few people i have ignored.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
34,691
Reaction score
19,925
waldoputty said:
neither u or i r football coaches or experts.
i rely on the standard approach where u rely on credible sources, but then draw logical conclusions from them.
for example, if one evaluation is from mcclay and one from garrett, i would rely on mcclay after a quick check of the facts.
scientific publications r usually written this way.
references r a respected and respectful way of rational discussions
Click to expand...
so one sentence from Mcclay in 2017, before training camp...and since then McClay has not talked to Garrett, given they don't talk to each other and cowboys have not drafted an TEs since, because they were sold on Rico...I mean isn't McClay in charge of scouting and directly involved in the draft....(oh oh, brain twist).

and given you like to cite science, which is evidence based, facts based and numbers based and not opinion based.... then you shouldn't have a hard time understanding why rico suck (oh oh, another brain twist)...

:muttley:
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
34,691
Reaction score
19,925
waldoputty said:
yep, lots of people like u.
mostly because they cannot see the upside, cannot handle the uncertainty, and want immediate gratification.
one even attack a MD member on cz because the medical opinion taught against his personal agenda.
even accused the MD as a fake MD, which actually is a crime.
one of the few people i have ignored.
Click to expand...
how do you know what side of Jaylon Smith argument I was on?

nice attempt at redirection to create confusion.... do you have that sinking feeling?

stick to the subject...do you feel cornered?
 
waldoputty

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
CowboysFaninHouston said:
so one sentence from Mcclay in 2017, before training camp...and since then McClay has not talked to Garrett, given they don't talk to each other and cowboys have not drafted an TEs since, because they were sold on Rico...I mean isn't McClay in charge of scouting and directly involved in the draft....(oh oh, brain twist).

and given you like to cite science, which is evidence based, facts based and numbers based and not opinion based.... then you shouldn't have a hard time understanding why rico suck (oh oh, another brain twist)...

:muttley:
Click to expand...

it was not one sentence. i took the trouble to provide the video. do try to listen to the whole thing with an open mind.

simple physics - conservation of momentum - a 280lb pound man will win in a collision with a 200-250lb man most of the time.

visual processing necessary for basketball rebounding or catching a pass in the cerebral cortex, including depth perception and timing, does not just degenerate over a few months or even 1 year unless there is an injury.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top